CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.602 > 0.121
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.090 > 0.124 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.450 > 0.148
Positive Predictive Value 0.805 > 0.102
Total TP 587 > 193
Total TN 752688 > 751519
Total FP 192 < 1749
Total FP CONTRA 48 < 319
Total FP INCONS 94 < 1386
Total FP COMP 50 > 44
Total FN 716 < 1110
P-value 2.41358941668e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 587
Total TN 752688
Total FP 192
Total FP CONTRA 48
Total FP INCONS 94
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 716
Total Scores
MCC 0.602
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.584 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.450
Positive Predictive Value 0.805
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00427 0.57 0.46 0.72 21 40726 18 1 7 10 25
SRP_00103 0.80 0.64 1.00 65 45386 0 0 0 0 37
SRP_00234 0.47 0.23 0.95 20 36294 1 0 1 0 66
SRP_00308 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 36308 0 0 0 0 81
SRP_00317 0.76 0.61 0.95 60 45087 8 0 3 5 38
SRP_00337 0.38 0.14 1.00 13 35498 0 0 0 0 78
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 193
Total TN 751519
Total FP 1749
Total FP CONTRA 319
Total FP INCONS 1386
Total FP COMP 44
Total FN 1110
Total Scores
MCC 0.121
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.124 ± 0.062
Sensitivity 0.148
Positive Predictive Value 0.102
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00427 0.06 0.09 0.04 4 40651 105 35 65 5 42
SRP_00103 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45319 132 14 118 0 102
SRP_00234 0.21 0.24 0.18 21 36200 97 19 75 3 65
SRP_00308 0.14 0.17 0.12 15 36189 112 18 93 1 73
SRP_00317 0.14 0.16 0.12 16 45018 116 16 100 0 82
SRP_00337 0.42 0.46 0.38 42 35400 70 15 54 1 49
TMR_00123 0.19 0.23 0.16 23 66283 126 20 104 2 78
TMR_00443 0.17 0.20 0.15 21 67018 126 24 98 4 83
TMR_00469 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 64469 145 27 112 6 88
TMR_00519 0.04 0.05 0.03 5 63046 141 33 106 2 90
TMR_00528 0.13 0.15 0.11 15 63051 131 20 104 7 82
TMR_00571 0.05 0.06 0.04 6 60577 149 19 124 6 93
TMR_00584 0.01 0.01 0.01 1 60922 159 33 119 7 96
TMR_00703 0.10 0.12 0.08 12 67376 140 26 114 0 87

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.