CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Sfold
MCC 0.565 > 0.523
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.043 > 0.515 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.413 < 0.471
Positive Predictive Value 0.772 > 0.582
Total TP 3079 < 3510
Total TN 4282091 > 4280047
Total FP 1146 < 2912
Total FP CONTRA 258 < 384
Total FP INCONS 649 < 2136
Total FP COMP 239 < 392
Total FN 4370 > 3939
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Sfold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3079
Total TN 4282091
Total FP 1146
Total FP CONTRA 258
Total FP INCONS 649
Total FP COMP 239
Total FN 4370
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.539 ± 0.043
Sensitivity 0.413
Positive Predictive Value 0.772
Nr of predictions 78

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.44 0.34 0.58 30 45399 23 1 21 1 59
ASE_00090 0.54 0.40 0.74 40 55557 14 0 14 0 61
ASE_00135 0.54 0.36 0.83 39 63143 16 0 8 8 70
ASE_00153 0.38 0.33 0.44 24 57576 38 7 23 8 49
ASE_00215 0.38 0.23 0.62 23 48479 16 0 14 2 76
ASE_00305 0.78 0.71 0.86 60 54545 14 1 9 4 25
ASE_00328 0.70 0.57 0.85 64 72696 14 5 6 3 48
ASE_00361 0.34 0.21 0.55 27 75417 26 3 19 4 100
ASE_00427 0.57 0.46 0.72 21 40726 18 1 7 10 25
ASE_00441 0.46 0.31 0.69 35 64210 16 0 16 0 77
SRP_00006 0.87 0.76 0.99 77 45675 4 0 1 3 24
SRP_00011 0.55 0.42 0.71 44 46298 18 4 14 0 60
SRP_00015 0.74 0.59 0.94 58 46298 5 3 1 1 41
SRP_00024 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 37668 0 0 0 0 80
SRP_00026 0.51 0.27 0.96 24 36831 1 0 1 0 64
SRP_00030 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 36849 0 0 0 0 81
SRP_00031 0.35 0.12 1.00 11 36304 0 0 0 0 78
SRP_00037 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 36585 0 0 0 0 87
SRP_00050 0.86 0.76 0.99 75 44774 3 0 1 2 24
SRP_00066 0.81 0.66 0.99 66 45384 1 0 1 0 34
SRP_00086 0.87 0.77 0.99 77 44175 3 0 1 2 23
SRP_00088 0.40 0.16 1.00 14 34177 0 0 0 0 75
SRP_00089 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35778 0 0 0 0 90
SRP_00090 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 35511 0 0 0 0 90
SRP_00102 0.86 0.77 0.95 78 44469 4 0 4 0 23
SRP_00103 0.80 0.64 1.00 65 45386 0 0 0 0 37
SRP_00152 0.52 0.27 1.00 28 45725 0 0 0 0 75
SRP_00171 0.74 0.61 0.89 54 45390 7 2 5 0 34
SRP_00178 0.36 0.13 1.00 13 45740 0 0 0 0 89
SRP_00179 0.39 0.16 0.94 17 46038 1 0 1 0 88
SRP_00181 0.41 0.17 1.00 17 46039 0 0 0 0 85
SRP_00182 0.78 0.66 0.92 67 45983 6 0 6 0 34
SRP_00188 0.26 0.14 0.48 11 31102 12 1 11 0 68
SRP_00228 0.88 0.78 0.99 74 45376 7 0 1 6 21
SRP_00234 0.47 0.23 0.95 20 36294 1 0 1 0 66
SRP_00308 0.28 0.08 1.00 7 36308 0 0 0 0 81
SRP_00317 0.76 0.61 0.95 60 45087 8 0 3 5 38
SRP_00335 0.42 0.18 1.00 7 35238 0 0 0 0 32
SRP_00337 0.38 0.14 1.00 13 35498 0 0 0 0 78
SRP_00347 0.80 0.66 0.98 63 46601 5 0 1 4 33
SRP_00368 0.77 0.59 1.00 58 43898 2 0 0 2 40
TMR_00017 0.60 0.45 0.81 46 67104 15 2 9 4 56
TMR_00018 0.52 0.41 0.64 38 64561 25 10 11 4 54
TMR_00042 0.60 0.42 0.85 41 62787 13 0 7 6 57
TMR_00046 0.48 0.40 0.58 38 62769 34 5 23 6 58
TMR_00048 0.61 0.46 0.80 44 64925 16 3 8 5 51
TMR_00080 0.49 0.41 0.60 39 70435 28 10 16 2 57
TMR_00082 0.43 0.31 0.59 30 67845 21 13 8 0 66
TMR_00123 0.60 0.46 0.79 46 66372 17 3 9 5 55
TMR_00137 0.47 0.37 0.59 33 61019 28 11 12 5 56
TMR_00142 0.56 0.47 0.67 48 70804 31 9 15 7 54
TMR_00207 0.52 0.39 0.70 40 72333 21 4 13 4 63
TMR_00257 0.56 0.40 0.78 39 67111 16 3 8 5 59
TMR_00271 0.48 0.34 0.69 31 64216 21 7 7 7 60
TMR_00332 0.52 0.41 0.66 41 67099 22 6 15 1 58
TMR_00366 0.55 0.46 0.65 46 67825 36 12 13 11 54
TMR_00378 0.55 0.46 0.65 45 67827 35 8 16 11 52
TMR_00404 0.66 0.54 0.81 50 67466 20 4 8 8 42
TMR_00427 0.47 0.34 0.65 33 67477 20 7 11 2 64
TMR_00443 0.56 0.41 0.75 43 67104 14 6 8 0 61
TMR_00451 0.34 0.25 0.47 22 63499 29 10 15 4 67
TMR_00458 0.55 0.42 0.72 39 63492 15 7 8 0 54
TMR_00469 0.72 0.61 0.86 61 64549 11 4 6 1 39
TMR_00472 0.75 0.63 0.88 61 64551 13 2 6 5 36
TMR_00519 0.50 0.40 0.62 38 63129 27 14 9 4 57
TMR_00520 0.40 0.31 0.52 31 63130 33 12 17 4 68
TMR_00522 0.54 0.42 0.68 41 63130 24 9 10 5 56
TMR_00528 0.49 0.40 0.59 39 63124 31 12 15 4 58
TMR_00540 0.47 0.37 0.59 38 73472 26 10 16 0 66
TMR_00568 0.72 0.66 0.78 65 60643 26 2 16 8 34
TMR_00571 0.77 0.71 0.83 70 60642 22 2 12 8 29
TMR_00580 0.53 0.47 0.59 47 60647 40 3 29 8 53
TMR_00584 0.71 0.65 0.79 63 60995 25 3 14 8 34
TMR_00586 0.61 0.52 0.72 50 61006 26 5 14 7 47
TMR_00616 0.66 0.57 0.77 56 67088 23 3 14 6 43
TMR_00699 0.54 0.38 0.76 39 67110 13 3 9 1 63
TMR_00702 0.42 0.32 0.56 32 67104 28 3 22 3 68
TMR_00703 0.56 0.41 0.76 41 67474 18 3 10 5 58

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 3510
Total TN 4280047
Total FP 2912
Total FP CONTRA 384
Total FP INCONS 2136
Total FP COMP 392
Total FN 3939
Total Scores
MCC 0.523
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.471
Positive Predictive Value 0.582
Nr of predictions 78

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00064 0.52 0.44 0.61 39 45387 31 1 24 6 50
ASE_00090 0.66 0.58 0.74 59 55531 22 1 20 1 42
ASE_00135 0.50 0.45 0.56 49 63103 42 0 38 4 60
ASE_00153 0.69 0.67 0.70 49 57560 61 2 19 40 24
ASE_00215 0.55 0.51 0.60 50 48432 37 4 30 3 49
ASE_00305 0.51 0.39 0.66 33 54565 22 1 16 5 52
ASE_00328 0.45 0.41 0.48 46 72676 54 3 46 5 66
ASE_00361 0.50 0.47 0.53 60 75353 57 6 47 4 67
ASE_00427 0.14 0.13 0.16 6 40718 39 8 23 8 40
ASE_00441 0.78 0.74 0.81 83 64159 25 3 16 6 29
SRP_00006 0.86 0.84 0.88 85 45656 15 3 9 3 16
SRP_00011 0.50 0.42 0.60 44 46287 30 0 29 1 60
SRP_00015 0.82 0.72 0.93 71 46284 11 0 5 6 28
SRP_00024 0.80 0.77 0.83 67 37594 14 4 10 0 20
SRP_00026 0.67 0.67 0.66 59 36767 38 2 28 8 29
SRP_00030 0.76 0.77 0.76 68 36766 24 4 18 2 20
SRP_00031 0.72 0.72 0.73 64 36227 25 2 22 1 25
SRP_00037 0.62 0.52 0.74 45 36524 16 1 15 0 42
SRP_00050 0.96 0.93 0.99 92 44757 4 0 1 3 7
SRP_00066 0.10 0.10 0.11 10 45363 78 8 70 0 90
SRP_00086 0.95 0.94 0.97 94 44156 6 0 3 3 6
SRP_00088 0.63 0.64 0.63 57 34100 34 3 31 0 32
SRP_00089 0.84 0.81 0.88 73 35695 10 1 9 0 17
SRP_00090 0.70 0.64 0.75 58 35434 21 1 18 2 32
SRP_00102 0.86 0.84 0.88 85 44454 14 1 11 2 16
SRP_00103 0.91 0.86 0.97 88 45360 3 0 3 0 14
SRP_00152 0.67 0.63 0.71 65 45661 28 1 26 1 38
SRP_00171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 45353 98 15 83 0 88
SRP_00178 0.82 0.75 0.90 77 45667 11 1 8 2 25
SRP_00179 0.87 0.80 0.94 84 45967 9 1 4 4 21
SRP_00181 0.33 0.29 0.37 30 45974 52 1 51 0 72
SRP_00182 0.73 0.70 0.76 71 45963 24 3 19 2 30
SRP_00188 0.20 0.18 0.23 14 31064 47 4 43 0 65
SRP_00228 0.96 0.94 0.98 89 45360 10 0 2 8 6
SRP_00234 0.78 0.76 0.80 65 36234 21 1 15 5 21
SRP_00308 0.62 0.59 0.65 52 36235 30 8 20 2 36
SRP_00317 0.94 0.89 0.99 87 45062 9 0 1 8 11
SRP_00335 0.32 0.44 0.24 17 35173 76 26 29 21 22
SRP_00337 0.70 0.68 0.73 62 35426 25 2 21 2 29
SRP_00347 0.83 0.81 0.84 78 46572 20 4 11 5 18
SRP_00368 0.95 0.94 0.97 92 43861 9 0 3 6 6
TMR_00017 0.30 0.24 0.39 24 67100 43 5 32 6 78
TMR_00018 0.22 0.21 0.24 19 64542 63 15 44 4 73
TMR_00042 0.20 0.18 0.23 18 62757 63 8 52 3 80
TMR_00046 0.61 0.56 0.66 54 62753 34 4 24 6 42
TMR_00048 0.39 0.34 0.46 32 64911 46 2 35 9 63
TMR_00080 0.54 0.40 0.75 38 70449 13 3 10 0 58
TMR_00082 0.48 0.43 0.53 41 67819 38 11 25 2 55
TMR_00123 0.32 0.27 0.39 27 66360 48 7 36 5 74
TMR_00137 0.17 0.17 0.18 15 60992 78 7 61 10 74
TMR_00142 0.42 0.35 0.50 36 70804 43 5 31 7 66
TMR_00207 0.37 0.35 0.38 36 72296 65 3 55 7 67
TMR_00257 0.08 0.07 0.09 7 67080 78 7 67 4 91
TMR_00271 0.54 0.48 0.60 44 64188 33 6 23 4 47
TMR_00332 0.35 0.30 0.42 30 67089 47 8 34 5 69
TMR_00366 0.33 0.31 0.36 31 67809 68 11 45 12 69
TMR_00378 0.29 0.25 0.34 24 67826 54 7 39 8 73
TMR_00404 0.41 0.37 0.45 34 67453 52 15 26 11 58
TMR_00427 0.38 0.25 0.57 24 67486 24 0 18 6 73
TMR_00443 0.41 0.31 0.55 32 67103 35 5 21 9 72
TMR_00451 0.18 0.17 0.19 15 63465 66 13 53 0 74
TMR_00458 0.25 0.16 0.38 15 63507 32 4 20 8 78
TMR_00469 0.41 0.42 0.40 42 64516 62 11 51 0 58
TMR_00472 0.38 0.33 0.43 32 64546 45 12 30 3 65
TMR_00519 0.14 0.15 0.14 14 63089 97 15 72 10 81
TMR_00520 0.51 0.41 0.62 41 63124 35 7 18 10 58
TMR_00522 0.48 0.38 0.62 37 63130 32 9 14 9 60
TMR_00528 0.32 0.15 0.65 15 63167 18 3 5 10 82
TMR_00540 0.48 0.35 0.68 36 73483 17 2 15 0 68
TMR_00568 0.52 0.35 0.78 35 60681 18 0 10 8 64
TMR_00571 0.50 0.33 0.75 33 60682 18 2 9 7 66
TMR_00580 0.38 0.25 0.57 25 60682 24 3 16 5 75
TMR_00584 0.58 0.55 0.62 53 60990 38 7 25 6 44
TMR_00586 0.28 0.25 0.32 24 61001 54 12 38 4 73
TMR_00616 0.40 0.38 0.41 38 67068 60 10 45 5 61
TMR_00699 0.31 0.29 0.34 30 67072 61 6 53 2 72
TMR_00702 0.13 0.11 0.15 11 67090 64 6 54 4 89
TMR_00703 0.37 0.31 0.44 31 67457 44 7 33 4 68

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.