CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Afold
MCC 0.773 > 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.100 > 0.614 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.652 > 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.917 > 0.621
Total TP 411 > 402
Total TN 391849 > 391650
Total FP 104 < 407
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 78
Total FP INCONS 28 < 167
Total FP COMP 67 < 162
Total FN 219 < 228
P-value 9.9460272886e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 411
Total TN 391849
Total FP 104
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 219
Total Scores
MCC 0.773
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.766 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.917
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.44 0.36 0.54 14 21295 18 7 5 6 25
RFA_00620 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 21918 15 2 8 5 22
RFA_00626 0.80 0.64 1.00 56 56560 5 0 0 5 31
RFA_00627 0.77 0.63 0.93 55 56894 8 0 4 4 32
RFA_00628 0.78 0.64 0.95 55 57233 12 0 3 9 31
RFA_00630 0.77 0.66 0.90 57 56890 15 0 6 9 30
RFA_00814 0.87 0.78 0.97 32 25167 6 0 1 5 9
RFA_00815 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 24499 8 0 0 8 9
RFA_00816 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 23188 6 0 1 5 10
RFA_00818 0.86 0.73 1.00 30 20271 6 0 0 6 11
RFA_00819 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 27934 5 0 0 5 9

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 402
Total TN 391650
Total FP 407
Total FP CONTRA 78
Total FP INCONS 167
Total FP COMP 162
Total FN 228
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.614 ± 0.154
Sensitivity 0.638
Positive Predictive Value 0.621
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.67 0.67 0.68 26 21283 26 7 5 14 13
RFA_00620 0.64 0.62 0.67 24 21909 26 3 9 14 15
RFA_00626 0.89 0.86 0.93 75 56535 31 2 4 25 12
RFA_00627 0.48 0.47 0.48 41 56868 50 10 34 6 46
RFA_00628 0.83 0.80 0.85 69 57210 38 1 11 26 17
RFA_00630 0.60 0.60 0.60 52 56866 46 8 27 11 35
RFA_00814 0.35 0.37 0.33 15 25155 42 7 23 12 26
RFA_00815 0.56 0.61 0.51 25 24482 35 8 16 11 16
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 33 13 11 9 14
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 48 19 26 3 32
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 32 0 1 31 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.