CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.779 > 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092 > 0.524 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.659 > 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.921 > 0.732
Total TP 442 > 262
Total TN 413762 < 413884
Total FP 105 < 108
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 14
Total FP INCONS 29 < 82
Total FP COMP 67 > 12
Total FN 229 < 409
P-value 2.32677072069e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 442
Total TN 413762
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 229
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.44 0.36 0.54 14 21295 18 7 5 6 25
RFA_00620 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 21918 15 2 8 5 22
RFA_00626 0.80 0.64 1.00 56 56560 5 0 0 5 31
RFA_00627 0.77 0.63 0.93 55 56894 8 0 4 4 32
RFA_00628 0.78 0.64 0.95 55 57233 12 0 3 9 31
RFA_00630 0.77 0.66 0.90 57 56890 15 0 6 9 30
RFA_00814 0.87 0.78 0.97 32 25167 6 0 1 5 9
RFA_00815 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 24499 8 0 0 8 9
RFA_00816 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 23188 6 0 1 5 10
RFA_00817 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 21913 1 0 1 0 10
RFA_00818 0.86 0.73 1.00 30 20271 6 0 0 6 11
RFA_00819 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 27934 5 0 0 5 9

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 262
Total TN 413884
Total FP 108
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 82
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 409
Total Scores
MCC 0.534
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.524 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.390
Positive Predictive Value 0.732
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.