CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.779 > 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092 > 0.421 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.659 > 0.499
Positive Predictive Value 0.921 > 0.452
Total TP 442 > 335
Total TN 413762 > 413501
Total FP 105 < 560
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 119
Total FP INCONS 29 < 287
Total FP COMP 67 < 154
Total FN 229 < 336
P-value 2.10198558684e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 442
Total TN 413762
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 229
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.44 0.36 0.54 14 21295 18 7 5 6 25
RFA_00620 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 21918 15 2 8 5 22
RFA_00626 0.80 0.64 1.00 56 56560 5 0 0 5 31
RFA_00627 0.77 0.63 0.93 55 56894 8 0 4 4 32
RFA_00628 0.78 0.64 0.95 55 57233 12 0 3 9 31
RFA_00630 0.77 0.66 0.90 57 56890 15 0 6 9 30
RFA_00814 0.87 0.78 0.97 32 25167 6 0 1 5 9
RFA_00815 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 24499 8 0 0 8 9
RFA_00816 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 23188 6 0 1 5 10
RFA_00817 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 21913 1 0 1 0 10
RFA_00818 0.86 0.73 1.00 30 20271 6 0 0 6 11
RFA_00819 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 27934 5 0 0 5 9

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 335
Total TN 413501
Total FP 560
Total FP CONTRA 119
Total FP INCONS 287
Total FP COMP 154
Total FN 336
Total Scores
MCC 0.474
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.499
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.41 0.46 0.37 18 21272 38 17 14 7 21
RFA_00620 0.55 0.59 0.51 23 21900 40 4 18 18 16
RFA_00626 0.64 0.63 0.65 55 56532 42 8 21 13 32
RFA_00627 0.65 0.63 0.67 55 56871 42 6 21 15 32
RFA_00628 0.89 0.85 0.94 73 57213 30 0 5 25 13
RFA_00630 0.57 0.57 0.57 50 56865 51 12 26 13 37
RFA_00814 0.24 0.27 0.21 11 25148 48 10 31 7 30
RFA_00815 0.36 0.41 0.31 17 24477 49 6 31 12 24
RFA_00816 0.21 0.24 0.19 10 23166 50 20 24 6 31
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21883 57 17 40 0 36
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20249 56 19 33 4 41
RFA_00819 0.44 0.44 0.44 18 27925 57 0 23 34 23

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.