CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Mastr(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Mastr(seed)
MCC 0.779 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092 > 0.261 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.659 > 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.921 > 0.895
Total TP 442 > 239
Total TN 413762 < 413975
Total FP 105 > 63
Total FP CONTRA 9 > 2
Total FP INCONS 29 > 26
Total FP COMP 67 > 35
Total FN 229 < 432
P-value 2.04409141234e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Mastr(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 442
Total TN 413762
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 229
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.44 0.36 0.54 14 21295 18 7 5 6 25
RFA_00620 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 21918 15 2 8 5 22
RFA_00626 0.80 0.64 1.00 56 56560 5 0 0 5 31
RFA_00627 0.77 0.63 0.93 55 56894 8 0 4 4 32
RFA_00628 0.78 0.64 0.95 55 57233 12 0 3 9 31
RFA_00630 0.77 0.66 0.90 57 56890 15 0 6 9 30
RFA_00814 0.87 0.78 0.97 32 25167 6 0 1 5 9
RFA_00815 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 24499 8 0 0 8 9
RFA_00816 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 23188 6 0 1 5 10
RFA_00817 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 21913 1 0 1 0 10
RFA_00818 0.86 0.73 1.00 30 20271 6 0 0 6 11
RFA_00819 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 27934 5 0 0 5 9

^top



Performance of Mastr(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 239
Total TN 413975
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 432
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.261 ± 0.248
Sensitivity 0.356
Positive Predictive Value 0.895
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21321 0 0 0 0 39
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21945 0 0 0 0 39
RFA_00626 0.61 0.51 0.75 44 56557 22 2 13 7 43
RFA_00627 0.84 0.75 0.94 65 56884 16 0 4 12 22
RFA_00628 0.88 0.80 0.96 69 57219 11 0 3 8 17
RFA_00630 0.80 0.70 0.91 61 56886 14 0 6 8 26
RFA_00814 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25200 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00815 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 24531 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23220 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00817 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21945 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20301 0 0 0 0 41
RFA_00819 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 27966 0 0 0 0 41

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.