CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) MaxExpect
MCC 0.779 > 0.637
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092 > 0.605 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.659 > 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.921 > 0.622
Total TP 442 > 439
Total TN 413762 > 413536
Total FP 105 < 413
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 81
Total FP INCONS 29 < 186
Total FP COMP 67 < 146
Total FN 229 < 232
P-value 8.44035332136e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MaxExpect).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MaxExpect).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 442
Total TN 413762
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 229
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.44 0.36 0.54 14 21295 18 7 5 6 25
RFA_00620 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 21918 15 2 8 5 22
RFA_00626 0.80 0.64 1.00 56 56560 5 0 0 5 31
RFA_00627 0.77 0.63 0.93 55 56894 8 0 4 4 32
RFA_00628 0.78 0.64 0.95 55 57233 12 0 3 9 31
RFA_00630 0.77 0.66 0.90 57 56890 15 0 6 9 30
RFA_00814 0.87 0.78 0.97 32 25167 6 0 1 5 9
RFA_00815 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 24499 8 0 0 8 9
RFA_00816 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 23188 6 0 1 5 10
RFA_00817 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 21913 1 0 1 0 10
RFA_00818 0.86 0.73 1.00 30 20271 6 0 0 6 11
RFA_00819 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 27934 5 0 0 5 9

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 439
Total TN 413536
Total FP 413
Total FP CONTRA 81
Total FP INCONS 186
Total FP COMP 146
Total FN 232
Total Scores
MCC 0.637
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.605 ± 0.166
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.68 0.67 0.70 26 21284 24 7 4 13 13
RFA_00620 0.44 0.49 0.40 19 21897 42 7 22 13 20
RFA_00626 0.88 0.84 0.92 73 56537 23 2 4 17 14
RFA_00627 0.71 0.68 0.74 59 56873 37 5 16 16 28
RFA_00628 0.91 0.88 0.94 76 57210 25 0 5 20 10
RFA_00630 0.66 0.66 0.66 57 56867 44 7 22 15 30
RFA_00814 0.24 0.27 0.22 11 25149 45 9 31 5 30
RFA_00815 0.57 0.61 0.54 25 24485 29 4 17 8 16
RFA_00816 0.63 0.66 0.60 27 23175 24 11 7 6 14
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21883 57 17 40 0 36
RFA_00818 0.48 0.54 0.43 22 20250 30 12 17 1 19
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 33 0 1 32 2

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.