CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Vsfold5
MCC 0.779 > 0.290
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092 > 0.287 ± 0.038
Sensitivity 0.659 > 0.303
Positive Predictive Value 0.921 > 0.280
Total TP 442 > 203
Total TN 413762 > 413517
Total FP 105 < 618
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 142
Total FP INCONS 29 < 380
Total FP COMP 67 < 96
Total FN 229 < 468
P-value 5.11462970451e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Vsfold5).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 442
Total TN 413762
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 229
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.44 0.36 0.54 14 21295 18 7 5 6 25
RFA_00620 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 21918 15 2 8 5 22
RFA_00626 0.80 0.64 1.00 56 56560 5 0 0 5 31
RFA_00627 0.77 0.63 0.93 55 56894 8 0 4 4 32
RFA_00628 0.78 0.64 0.95 55 57233 12 0 3 9 31
RFA_00630 0.77 0.66 0.90 57 56890 15 0 6 9 30
RFA_00814 0.87 0.78 0.97 32 25167 6 0 1 5 9
RFA_00815 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 24499 8 0 0 8 9
RFA_00816 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 23188 6 0 1 5 10
RFA_00817 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 21913 1 0 1 0 10
RFA_00818 0.86 0.73 1.00 30 20271 6 0 0 6 11
RFA_00819 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 27934 5 0 0 5 9

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 203
Total TN 413517
Total FP 618
Total FP CONTRA 142
Total FP INCONS 380
Total FP COMP 96
Total FN 468
Total Scores
MCC 0.290
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.287 ± 0.038
Sensitivity 0.303
Positive Predictive Value 0.280
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.41 0.49 0.35 19 21267 43 15 20 8 20
RFA_00620 0.23 0.23 0.24 9 21907 41 6 23 12 30
RFA_00626 0.31 0.31 0.32 27 56531 62 15 43 4 60
RFA_00627 0.26 0.26 0.26 23 56863 69 16 51 2 64
RFA_00628 0.34 0.35 0.34 30 57202 66 13 46 7 56
RFA_00630 0.27 0.29 0.26 25 56857 78 13 58 7 62
RFA_00814 0.31 0.34 0.29 14 25151 46 10 25 11 27
RFA_00815 0.22 0.24 0.20 10 24480 46 18 23 5 31
RFA_00816 0.31 0.32 0.30 13 23177 38 12 18 8 28
RFA_00817 0.32 0.34 0.30 14 21898 35 10 23 2 27
RFA_00818 0.19 0.20 0.19 8 20258 41 8 27 6 33
RFA_00819 0.27 0.27 0.28 11 27926 53 6 23 24 30

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.