CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & RNASampler(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) RNASampler(seed)
MCC 0.902 > 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.879 ± 0.039 > 0.774 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.818 > 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.995 > 0.921
Total TP 549 > 442
Total TN 413690 < 413762
Total FP 31 < 105
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 9
Total FP INCONS 3 < 29
Total FP COMP 28 < 67
Total FN 122 < 229
P-value 1.64481516727e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RNASampler(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 549
Total TN 413690
Total FP 31
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 3
Total FP COMP 28
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.902
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.879 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.818
Positive Predictive Value 0.995
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.89 0.79 1.00 31 21290 0 0 0 0 8
RFA_00620 0.88 0.77 1.00 30 21915 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00626 0.97 0.94 1.00 82 56534 6 0 0 6 5
RFA_00627 0.96 0.93 1.00 81 56872 7 0 0 7 6
RFA_00628 0.97 0.94 1.00 81 57210 6 0 0 6 5
RFA_00630 0.92 0.87 0.96 76 56874 12 0 3 9 11
RFA_00814 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 25172 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00815 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 24503 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00816 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 23192 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00817 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 21917 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00818 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 20273 0 0 0 0 13
RFA_00819 0.83 0.68 1.00 28 27938 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 442
Total TN 413762
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 67
Total FN 229
Total Scores
MCC 0.779
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.774 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.921
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
RFA_00606 0.44 0.36 0.54 14 21295 18 7 5 6 25
RFA_00620 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 21918 15 2 8 5 22
RFA_00626 0.80 0.64 1.00 56 56560 5 0 0 5 31
RFA_00627 0.77 0.63 0.93 55 56894 8 0 4 4 32
RFA_00628 0.78 0.64 0.95 55 57233 12 0 3 9 31
RFA_00630 0.77 0.66 0.90 57 56890 15 0 6 9 30
RFA_00814 0.87 0.78 0.97 32 25167 6 0 1 5 9
RFA_00815 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 24499 8 0 0 8 9
RFA_00816 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 23188 6 0 1 5 10
RFA_00817 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 21913 1 0 1 0 10
RFA_00818 0.86 0.73 1.00 30 20271 6 0 0 6 11
RFA_00819 0.88 0.78 1.00 32 27934 5 0 0 5 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.