CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.677 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.059 > 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.626 > 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.733 < 0.762
Total TP 2880 > 1249
Total TN 2620763 < 2623051
Total FP 1394 > 419
Total FP CONTRA 215 > 30
Total FP INCONS 832 > 360
Total FP COMP 347 > 29
Total FN 1723 < 3354
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2880
Total TN 2620763
Total FP 1394
Total FP CONTRA 215
Total FP INCONS 832
Total FP COMP 347
Total FN 1723
Total Scores
MCC 0.677
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.059
Sensitivity 0.626
Positive Predictive Value 0.733
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.36 0.27 0.48 31 103675 57 8 26 23 84
CRW_00016 0.80 0.65 0.98 78 77341 14 0 2 12 42
CRW_00610 0.51 0.49 0.52 40 36238 37 9 28 0 41
CRW_00613 0.74 0.67 0.83 52 34917 19 0 11 8 26
CRW_00614 0.19 0.19 0.19 11 121713 102 12 35 55 46
CRW_00618 0.13 0.13 0.14 8 56223 68 13 36 19 53
CRW_00633 0.65 0.49 0.85 52 63485 11 2 7 2 54
CRW_00634 0.54 0.51 0.58 48 64537 40 6 29 5 46
CRW_00670 0.80 0.74 0.87 89 70023 15 6 7 2 31
CRW_00671 0.75 0.70 0.81 82 62734 23 5 14 4 35
CRW_00672 0.78 0.71 0.85 79 72297 20 6 8 6 32
CRW_00674 0.60 0.54 0.66 67 83335 36 6 28 2 57
CRW_00676 0.61 0.57 0.66 65 93430 48 9 24 15 50
CRW_00692 0.54 0.42 0.69 38 68580 27 6 11 10 52
PDB_00827 0.64 0.47 0.86 38 26984 8 0 6 2 43
RFA_00606 0.65 0.59 0.72 23 21289 19 7 2 10 16
RFA_00620 0.55 0.49 0.63 19 21915 22 3 8 11 20
RFA_00626 0.89 0.84 0.95 73 56539 20 1 3 16 14
RFA_00627 0.72 0.68 0.77 59 56876 30 4 14 12 28
RFA_00628 0.90 0.86 0.95 74 57213 28 0 4 24 12
RFA_00630 0.61 0.59 0.65 51 56874 38 7 21 10 36
RFA_00639 0.27 0.24 0.30 21 54546 53 9 39 5 66
RFA_00814 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 25168 10 0 1 9 10
RFA_00815 0.61 0.61 0.61 25 24490 21 6 10 5 16
RFA_00816 0.76 0.73 0.79 30 23182 12 8 0 4 11
RFA_00817 0.11 0.12 0.11 5 21899 41 14 27 0 36
RFA_00818 0.31 0.22 0.43 9 20280 13 8 4 1 32
RFA_00819 0.88 0.80 0.97 33 27932 25 0 1 24 8
SRP_00016 0.92 0.89 0.95 97 47793 7 0 5 2 12
SRP_00130 0.36 0.32 0.40 31 49693 46 7 39 0 66
SRP_00142 0.63 0.59 0.68 55 45975 28 2 24 2 38
SRP_00143 0.80 0.78 0.81 79 49673 25 1 17 7 22
SRP_00144 0.74 0.73 0.75 69 46573 27 1 22 4 25
SRP_00197 0.43 0.37 0.51 37 49382 36 1 35 0 64
SRP_00198 0.42 0.35 0.51 36 50970 35 2 32 1 67
SRP_00199 0.78 0.72 0.84 76 50950 15 0 14 1 29
SRP_00201 0.87 0.84 0.89 93 47791 13 5 6 2 18
SRP_00202 0.91 0.86 0.95 101 54179 7 0 5 2 16
SRP_00203 0.80 0.81 0.79 85 48720 29 1 22 6 20
SRP_00204 0.67 0.66 0.68 67 49043 32 6 25 1 35
SRP_00206 0.84 0.83 0.85 90 47789 17 5 11 1 18
SRP_00208 0.71 0.64 0.79 65 46583 18 2 15 1 36
SRP_00255 0.62 0.62 0.62 58 47492 40 3 33 4 36
SRP_00276 0.87 0.85 0.89 94 50615 13 5 7 1 16
SRP_00278 0.81 0.73 0.89 77 45969 12 0 10 2 28
SRP_00321 0.77 0.75 0.79 81 47483 24 3 19 2 27
SRP_00322 0.71 0.66 0.76 72 48421 24 4 19 1 37
SRP_00323 0.92 0.92 0.93 98 47173 11 0 7 4 9
SRP_00330 0.50 0.44 0.57 42 50012 33 1 31 1 53
SRP_00332 0.84 0.81 0.87 86 50304 16 6 7 3 20
SRP_00339 0.67 0.64 0.70 60 44465 29 5 21 3 34

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1249
Total TN 2623051
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3354
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.