CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Afold
MCC 0.799 > 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.821 ± 0.081 > 0.614 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.774 > 0.646
Positive Predictive Value 0.826 > 0.619
Total TP 724 > 605
Total TN 525624 > 525523
Total FP 277 < 507
Total FP CONTRA 29 < 99
Total FP INCONS 123 < 273
Total FP COMP 125 < 135
Total FN 212 < 331
P-value 2.24270395587e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 724
Total TN 525624
Total FP 277
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 123
Total FP COMP 125
Total FN 212
Total Scores
MCC 0.799
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.821 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.774
Positive Predictive Value 0.826
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 605
Total TN 525523
Total FP 507
Total FP CONTRA 99
Total FP INCONS 273
Total FP COMP 135
Total FN 331
Total Scores
MCC 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.614 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.646
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.61 0.62 0.60 40 27194 28 6 21 1 25
RFA_00626 0.89 0.86 0.93 75 56535 31 2 4 25 12
RFA_00627 0.48 0.47 0.48 41 56868 50 10 34 6 46
RFA_00628 0.83 0.80 0.85 69 57210 38 1 11 26 17
RFA_00630 0.60 0.60 0.60 52 56866 46 8 27 11 35
RFA_00814 0.35 0.37 0.33 15 25155 42 7 23 12 26
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 33 13 11 9 14
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 48 19 26 3 32
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 32 0 1 31 2
SRP_00241 0.54 0.59 0.51 48 45961 50 11 36 3 34
SRP_00257 0.85 0.87 0.84 94 50928 20 4 14 2 14
SRP_00308 0.55 0.55 0.56 48 36229 42 9 29 4 40
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41235 47 9 36 2 34

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.