CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) CRWrnafold
MCC 0.787 > 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.467 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.500
Total TP 1052 > 716
Total TN 797739 > 797599
Total FP 383 < 862
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 161
Total FP INCONS 199 < 554
Total FP COMP 144 < 147
Total FN 332 < 668
P-value 3.16042554876e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CRWrnafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 716
Total TN 797599
Total FP 862
Total FP CONTRA 161
Total FP INCONS 554
Total FP COMP 147
Total FN 668
Total Scores
MCC 0.508
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.467 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.500
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.48 0.48 0.49 31 27198 38 3 29 6 34
RFA_00626 0.64 0.63 0.65 55 56532 42 8 21 13 32
RFA_00627 0.65 0.63 0.67 55 56871 42 6 21 15 32
RFA_00628 0.89 0.85 0.94 73 57213 30 0 5 25 13
RFA_00630 0.57 0.57 0.57 50 56865 51 12 26 13 37
RFA_00805 0.48 0.48 0.49 72 133238 87 7 69 11 78
RFA_00814 0.24 0.27 0.21 11 25148 48 10 31 7 30
RFA_00816 0.21 0.24 0.19 10 23166 50 20 24 6 31
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21883 57 17 40 0 36
RFA_00818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20249 56 19 33 4 41
RFA_00819 0.44 0.44 0.44 18 27925 57 0 23 34 23
SRP_00241 0.54 0.57 0.51 47 45963 48 17 29 2 35
SRP_00257 0.81 0.79 0.83 85 50938 20 5 12 3 23
SRP_00308 0.67 0.67 0.67 59 36227 29 4 25 0 29
SRP_00328 0.55 0.55 0.55 47 39536 41 8 30 3 38
SRP_00329 0.25 0.25 0.25 21 39818 65 10 54 1 64
SRP_00331 0.41 0.41 0.42 36 37589 51 7 43 1 51
SRP_00340 0.48 0.50 0.47 41 41240 50 8 39 3 41

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.