CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.787 > 0.751
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.779 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.665
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 < 0.849
Total TP 1052 > 921
Total TN 797739 < 797945
Total FP 383 > 268
Total FP CONTRA 40 > 27
Total FP INCONS 199 > 137
Total FP COMP 144 > 104
Total FN 332 < 463
P-value 3.18846395401e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 921
Total TN 797945
Total FP 268
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 104
Total FN 463
Total Scores
MCC 0.751
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.779 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.665
Positive Predictive Value 0.849
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.74 0.65 0.86 42 27212 9 0 7 2 23
RFA_00626 0.98 0.95 1.00 83 56533 8 0 0 8 4
RFA_00627 0.98 0.97 1.00 84 56869 10 0 0 10 3
RFA_00628 0.98 0.95 1.00 82 57209 12 0 0 12 4
RFA_00630 0.93 0.90 0.96 78 56872 16 0 3 13 9
RFA_00805 0.64 0.41 1.00 61 133325 1 0 0 1 89
RFA_00814 0.91 0.83 1.00 34 25166 1 0 0 1 7
RFA_00816 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 23184 1 0 0 1 5
RFA_00817 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 21910 1 0 0 1 6
RFA_00818 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 20265 1 0 0 1 5
RFA_00819 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 27930 1 0 0 1 5
SRP_00241 0.53 0.51 0.55 42 45979 47 8 27 12 40
SRP_00257 0.54 0.47 0.62 51 50958 33 5 26 2 57
SRP_00308 0.55 0.31 1.00 27 36288 4 0 0 4 61
SRP_00328 0.59 0.54 0.65 46 39550 30 5 20 5 39
SRP_00329 0.71 0.64 0.79 54 39835 24 2 12 10 31
SRP_00331 0.65 0.59 0.73 51 37605 26 2 17 7 36
SRP_00340 0.55 0.52 0.59 43 41255 43 5 25 13 39

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.