CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Contrafold
MCC 0.787 > 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.653 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.672
Total TP 1052 > 947
Total TN 797739 > 797621
Total FP 383 < 630
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 107
Total FP INCONS 199 < 355
Total FP COMP 144 < 168
Total FN 332 < 437
P-value 2.59578924681e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 947
Total TN 797621
Total FP 630
Total FP CONTRA 107
Total FP INCONS 355
Total FP COMP 168
Total FN 437
Total Scores
MCC 0.678
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.672
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.58 0.60 0.57 39 27192 31 7 23 1 26
RFA_00626 0.91 0.87 0.94 76 56535 26 1 4 21 11
RFA_00627 0.86 0.83 0.89 72 56872 28 0 9 19 15
RFA_00628 0.91 0.88 0.94 76 57210 25 0 5 20 10
RFA_00630 0.77 0.77 0.77 67 56866 34 6 14 14 20
RFA_00805 0.83 0.74 0.93 111 133266 19 1 8 10 39
RFA_00814 0.79 0.78 0.80 32 25160 19 1 7 11 9
RFA_00816 0.72 0.73 0.71 30 23178 20 8 4 8 11
RFA_00817 0.11 0.12 0.10 5 21893 47 12 35 0 36
RFA_00818 0.57 0.61 0.53 25 20254 32 11 11 10 16
RFA_00819 0.46 0.46 0.45 19 27924 47 3 20 24 22
SRP_00241 0.51 0.55 0.47 45 45961 53 14 36 3 37
SRP_00257 0.86 0.85 0.88 92 50935 22 0 13 9 16
SRP_00308 0.66 0.68 0.64 60 36221 37 6 28 3 28
SRP_00328 0.60 0.62 0.58 53 39530 41 10 28 3 32
SRP_00329 0.59 0.61 0.58 52 39813 43 6 32 5 33
SRP_00331 0.52 0.54 0.50 47 37581 50 10 37 3 40
SRP_00340 0.51 0.56 0.47 46 41230 56 11 41 4 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.