CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.787 > 0.643
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.622 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.630
Total TP 1052 > 911
Total TN 797739 > 797584
Total FP 383 < 713
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 124
Total FP INCONS 199 < 411
Total FP COMP 144 < 178
Total FN 332 < 473
P-value 2.41358941668e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 911
Total TN 797584
Total FP 713
Total FP CONTRA 124
Total FP INCONS 411
Total FP COMP 178
Total FN 473
Total Scores
MCC 0.643
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.622 ± 0.088
Sensitivity 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.630
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.65 0.66 0.64 43 27194 25 6 18 1 22
RFA_00626 0.86 0.82 0.90 71 56537 35 2 6 27 16
RFA_00627 0.68 0.67 0.69 58 56869 42 7 19 16 29
RFA_00628 0.87 0.84 0.90 72 57211 30 0 8 22 14
RFA_00630 0.62 0.63 0.61 55 56863 52 9 26 17 32
RFA_00805 0.70 0.68 0.72 102 133245 49 5 34 10 48
RFA_00814 0.22 0.24 0.19 10 25148 51 11 31 9 31
RFA_00816 0.61 0.66 0.56 27 23172 33 13 8 12 14
RFA_00817 0.35 0.41 0.30 17 21889 43 11 28 4 24
RFA_00818 0.46 0.54 0.40 22 20246 38 13 20 5 19
RFA_00819 0.83 0.80 0.85 33 27927 41 0 6 35 8
SRP_00241 0.45 0.49 0.41 40 45958 60 17 41 2 42
SRP_00257 0.84 0.85 0.83 92 50929 21 4 15 2 16
SRP_00308 0.73 0.74 0.72 65 36225 26 2 23 1 23
SRP_00328 0.63 0.65 0.62 55 39532 39 8 26 5 30
SRP_00329 0.64 0.65 0.63 55 39816 37 5 27 5 30
SRP_00331 0.58 0.57 0.58 50 37589 39 3 33 3 37
SRP_00340 0.50 0.54 0.47 44 41234 52 8 42 2 38

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.