CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) IPknot
MCC 0.787 > 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.703 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.719
Total TP 1052 > 939
Total TN 797739 > 797724
Total FP 383 < 475
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 93
Total FP INCONS 199 < 274
Total FP COMP 144 > 108
Total FN 332 < 445
P-value 2.97012568641e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 939
Total TN 797724
Total FP 475
Total FP CONTRA 93
Total FP INCONS 274
Total FP COMP 108
Total FN 445
Total Scores
MCC 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.703 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.719
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.58 0.58 0.58 38 27195 30 7 21 2 27
RFA_00626 0.89 0.85 0.94 74 56537 14 0 5 9 13
RFA_00627 0.69 0.66 0.73 57 56875 35 4 17 14 30
RFA_00628 0.95 0.90 1.00 77 57214 14 0 0 14 9
RFA_00630 0.82 0.75 0.89 65 56880 14 0 8 6 22
RFA_00805 0.65 0.55 0.75 83 133276 35 1 26 8 67
RFA_00814 0.89 0.88 0.90 36 25160 11 0 4 7 5
RFA_00816 0.82 0.85 0.80 35 23176 12 8 1 3 6
RFA_00817 0.23 0.24 0.22 10 21900 38 11 24 3 31
RFA_00818 0.69 0.68 0.70 28 20261 15 9 3 3 13
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 26 0 1 25 2
SRP_00241 0.57 0.60 0.54 49 45965 44 12 30 2 33
SRP_00257 0.83 0.81 0.85 88 50937 17 4 11 2 20
SRP_00308 0.74 0.68 0.81 60 36241 15 6 8 1 28
SRP_00328 0.65 0.65 0.66 55 39538 29 8 20 1 30
SRP_00329 0.63 0.61 0.65 52 39823 31 5 23 3 33
SRP_00331 0.52 0.53 0.51 46 37584 47 9 36 2 41
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.51 47 41236 48 9 36 3 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.