CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.787 > 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.757 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.692
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.785
Total TP 1052 > 958
Total TN 797739 < 797809
Total FP 383 < 514
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 44
Total FP INCONS 199 < 219
Total FP COMP 144 < 251
Total FN 332 < 426
P-value 3.30280588002e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 958
Total TN 797809
Total FP 514
Total FP CONTRA 44
Total FP INCONS 219
Total FP COMP 251
Total FN 426
Total Scores
MCC 0.737
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.692
Positive Predictive Value 0.785
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.69 0.54 0.90 35 27222 5 0 4 1 30
RFA_00626 0.89 0.87 0.92 76 56533 29 2 5 22 11
RFA_00627 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 36 1 9 26 18
RFA_00628 0.85 0.81 0.89 70 57212 38 2 7 29 16
RFA_00630 0.82 0.78 0.86 68 56874 33 2 9 22 19
RFA_00805 0.78 0.72 0.84 108 133257 31 1 20 10 42
RFA_00814 0.95 0.93 0.97 38 25161 22 0 1 21 3
RFA_00816 0.96 0.93 1.00 38 23182 15 0 0 15 3
RFA_00817 0.94 0.88 1.00 36 21909 12 0 0 12 5
RFA_00818 0.64 0.68 0.61 28 20255 30 11 7 12 13
RFA_00819 0.94 0.90 0.97 37 27928 26 0 1 25 4
SRP_00241 0.50 0.51 0.49 42 45970 54 8 36 10 40
SRP_00257 0.62 0.55 0.69 59 50955 29 4 22 3 49
SRP_00308 0.82 0.73 0.91 64 36245 15 0 6 9 24
SRP_00328 0.64 0.60 0.69 51 39547 31 4 19 8 34
SRP_00329 0.63 0.60 0.65 51 39825 35 4 23 8 34
SRP_00331 0.55 0.48 0.64 42 37609 30 1 23 6 45
SRP_00340 0.58 0.56 0.60 46 41251 43 4 27 12 36

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.