CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & MaxExpect [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) MaxExpect
MCC 0.787 > 0.641
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.619 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.631
Total TP 1052 > 902
Total TN 797739 > 797601
Total FP 383 < 667
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 123
Total FP INCONS 199 < 404
Total FP COMP 144 > 140
Total FN 332 < 482
P-value 3.13260312532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and MaxExpect. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MaxExpect).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MaxExpect).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and MaxExpect. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MaxExpect).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of MaxExpect - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 902
Total TN 797601
Total FP 667
Total FP CONTRA 123
Total FP INCONS 404
Total FP COMP 140
Total FN 482
Total Scores
MCC 0.641
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.652
Positive Predictive Value 0.631
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.65 0.66 0.64 43 27194 24 6 18 0 22
RFA_00626 0.88 0.84 0.92 73 56537 23 2 4 17 14
RFA_00627 0.71 0.68 0.74 59 56873 37 5 16 16 28
RFA_00628 0.91 0.88 0.94 76 57210 25 0 5 20 10
RFA_00630 0.66 0.66 0.66 57 56867 44 7 22 15 30
RFA_00805 0.72 0.69 0.75 104 133247 44 5 30 9 46
RFA_00814 0.24 0.27 0.22 11 25149 45 9 31 5 30
RFA_00816 0.63 0.66 0.60 27 23175 24 11 7 6 14
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21883 57 17 40 0 36
RFA_00818 0.48 0.54 0.43 22 20250 30 12 17 1 19
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 33 0 1 32 2
SRP_00241 0.44 0.48 0.41 39 45961 58 14 42 2 43
SRP_00257 0.84 0.84 0.84 91 50932 19 3 14 2 17
SRP_00308 0.72 0.73 0.72 64 36226 26 2 23 1 24
SRP_00328 0.62 0.64 0.61 54 39532 40 8 27 5 31
SRP_00329 0.57 0.58 0.57 49 39817 41 6 31 4 36
SRP_00331 0.52 0.53 0.52 46 37586 45 7 36 2 41
SRP_00340 0.49 0.52 0.47 43 41236 52 9 40 3 39

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.