CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) McQFold
MCC 0.787 > 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.465 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.452
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.471
Total TP 1052 > 626
Total TN 797739 > 797701
Total FP 383 < 778
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 134
Total FP INCONS 199 < 569
Total FP COMP 144 > 75
Total FN 332 < 758
P-value 2.8150742666e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 626
Total TN 797701
Total FP 778
Total FP CONTRA 134
Total FP INCONS 569
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 758
Total Scores
MCC 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.465 ± 0.082
Sensitivity 0.452
Positive Predictive Value 0.471
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.57 0.55 0.58 36 27199 28 6 20 2 29
RFA_00626 0.21 0.22 0.21 19 56526 76 15 56 5 68
RFA_00627 0.42 0.40 0.44 35 56873 47 13 32 2 52
RFA_00628 0.42 0.41 0.43 35 57209 50 7 40 3 51
RFA_00630 0.63 0.63 0.63 55 56865 41 6 27 8 32
RFA_00805 0.56 0.52 0.60 78 133256 57 3 49 5 72
RFA_00814 0.79 0.80 0.77 33 25157 21 0 10 11 8
RFA_00816 0.82 0.85 0.80 35 23176 12 4 5 3 6
RFA_00817 0.35 0.39 0.31 16 21894 39 9 26 4 25
RFA_00818 0.28 0.27 0.29 11 20263 30 12 15 3 30
RFA_00819 0.30 0.29 0.31 12 27927 50 4 23 23 29
SRP_00241 0.30 0.30 0.29 25 45971 62 12 48 2 57
SRP_00257 0.44 0.40 0.49 43 50953 45 7 37 1 65
SRP_00308 0.45 0.42 0.48 37 36238 40 5 35 0 51
SRP_00328 0.49 0.49 0.49 42 39536 43 10 33 0 43
SRP_00329 0.38 0.38 0.40 32 39822 50 8 41 1 53
SRP_00331 0.50 0.47 0.53 41 37598 36 4 32 0 46
SRP_00340 0.48 0.50 0.46 41 41238 51 9 40 2 41

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.