CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
MCC 0.789 > 0.764
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.808 ± 0.070 > 0.801 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.762 > 0.719
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.813
Total TP 987 > 932
Total TN 761508 < 761569
Total FP 363 > 355
Total FP CONTRA 38 > 31
Total FP INCONS 182 < 183
Total FP COMP 143 > 141
Total FN 309 < 364
P-value 3.73923511064e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 987
Total TN 761508
Total FP 363
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 182
Total FP COMP 143
Total FN 309
Total Scores
MCC 0.789
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.808 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.762
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 932
Total TN 761569
Total FP 355
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 183
Total FP COMP 141
Total FN 364
Total Scores
MCC 0.764
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.719
Positive Predictive Value 0.813
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.68 0.65 0.71 42 27202 24 2 15 7 23
RFA_00626 0.96 0.92 1.00 80 56536 7 0 0 7 7
RFA_00627 0.96 0.93 1.00 81 56872 12 0 0 12 6
RFA_00628 0.96 0.93 1.00 80 57211 12 0 0 12 6
RFA_00630 0.92 0.87 0.97 76 56875 17 0 2 15 11
RFA_00805 0.64 0.49 0.84 73 133299 16 0 14 2 77
RFA_00814 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 25161 5 0 0 5 2
RFA_00816 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 23181 6 0 0 6 2
RFA_00817 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 21906 4 0 0 4 2
RFA_00818 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 20262 3 0 0 3 2
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 6 0 0 6 2
SRP_00241 0.55 0.56 0.55 46 45972 53 9 29 15 36
SRP_00257 0.53 0.48 0.58 52 50950 42 5 33 4 56
SRP_00328 0.61 0.59 0.64 50 39543 34 5 23 6 35
SRP_00329 0.75 0.72 0.78 61 39825 29 2 15 12 24
SRP_00331 0.65 0.61 0.69 53 37598 34 2 22 10 34
SRP_00340 0.53 0.52 0.54 43 41249 51 6 30 15 39

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.