CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) ProbKnot
MCC 0.787 > 0.651
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.635 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.668
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.635
Total TP 1052 > 925
Total TN 797739 > 797573
Total FP 383 < 711
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 132
Total FP INCONS 199 < 400
Total FP COMP 144 < 179
Total FN 332 < 459
P-value 1.66062906821e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 925
Total TN 797573
Total FP 711
Total FP CONTRA 132
Total FP INCONS 400
Total FP COMP 179
Total FN 459
Total Scores
MCC 0.651
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.109
Sensitivity 0.668
Positive Predictive Value 0.635
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.64 0.66 0.62 43 27192 28 6 20 2 22
RFA_00626 0.86 0.80 0.91 70 56539 32 1 6 25 17
RFA_00627 0.69 0.69 0.68 60 56865 47 6 22 19 27
RFA_00628 0.90 0.88 0.93 76 57209 31 1 5 25 10
RFA_00630 0.69 0.66 0.72 57 56874 41 4 18 19 30
RFA_00805 0.73 0.72 0.73 108 133239 49 5 34 10 42
RFA_00814 0.32 0.37 0.28 15 25146 45 8 31 6 26
RFA_00816 0.80 0.88 0.73 36 23171 20 9 4 7 5
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21883 57 18 39 0 36
RFA_00818 0.48 0.54 0.43 22 20250 38 13 16 9 19
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 34 0 1 33 2
SRP_00241 0.44 0.48 0.41 39 45960 60 17 40 3 43
SRP_00257 0.86 0.86 0.86 93 50932 18 5 10 3 15
SRP_00308 0.73 0.75 0.71 66 36222 30 4 23 3 22
SRP_00328 0.62 0.65 0.59 55 39528 43 10 28 5 30
SRP_00329 0.57 0.58 0.56 49 39816 43 8 30 5 36
SRP_00331 0.54 0.54 0.55 47 37589 42 7 32 3 40
SRP_00340 0.51 0.55 0.47 45 41232 53 10 41 2 37

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.