CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNASLOpt
MCC 0.776 > 0.463
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.070 > 0.454 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.753 > 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.802 > 0.473
Total TP 929 > 560
Total TN 664485 > 664461
Total FP 370 < 701
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 140
Total FP INCONS 190 < 483
Total FP COMP 140 > 78
Total FN 305 < 674
P-value 2.78993384543e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 929
Total TN 664485
Total FP 370
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 190
Total FP COMP 140
Total FN 305
Total Scores
MCC 0.776
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.753
Positive Predictive Value 0.802
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 560
Total TN 664461
Total FP 701
Total FP CONTRA 140
Total FP INCONS 483
Total FP COMP 78
Total FN 674
Total Scores
MCC 0.463
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.454 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.454
Positive Predictive Value 0.473
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.36 0.34 0.38 22 27203 38 4 32 2 43
RFA_00626 0.68 0.64 0.72 56 56538 30 6 16 8 31
RFA_00627 0.61 0.60 0.62 52 56869 41 11 21 9 35
RFA_00628 0.89 0.84 0.95 72 57215 15 0 4 11 14
RFA_00630 0.69 0.67 0.72 58 56872 32 5 18 9 29
RFA_00814 0.51 0.51 0.51 21 25159 29 9 11 9 20
RFA_00816 0.58 0.63 0.53 26 23171 26 13 10 3 15
RFA_00817 0.24 0.27 0.22 11 21896 42 12 26 4 30
RFA_00818 0.21 0.22 0.21 9 20258 39 14 20 5 32
RFA_00819 0.60 0.68 0.53 28 27913 34 16 9 9 13
SRP_00241 0.26 0.27 0.26 22 45970 66 14 50 2 60
SRP_00257 0.56 0.52 0.61 56 50948 37 1 35 1 52
SRP_00308 0.14 0.14 0.15 12 36233 70 11 59 0 76
SRP_00328 0.60 0.60 0.61 51 39537 36 7 26 3 34
SRP_00329 0.34 0.32 0.36 27 39829 50 4 43 3 58
SRP_00331 0.15 0.13 0.17 11 37612 52 1 51 0 76
SRP_00340 0.30 0.32 0.29 26 41238 64 12 52 0 56

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.