CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAfold
MCC 0.787 > 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.668 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.682
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.662
Total TP 1052 > 944
Total TN 797739 > 797603
Total FP 383 < 650
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 110
Total FP INCONS 199 < 373
Total FP COMP 144 < 167
Total FN 332 < 440
P-value 2.64318034126e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAfold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 944
Total TN 797603
Total FP 650
Total FP CONTRA 110
Total FP INCONS 373
Total FP COMP 167
Total FN 440
Total Scores
MCC 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.668 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.682
Positive Predictive Value 0.662
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.59 0.60 0.59 39 27195 28 6 21 1 26
RFA_00626 0.96 0.92 1.00 80 56536 25 0 0 25 7
RFA_00627 0.72 0.69 0.75 60 56873 35 4 16 15 27
RFA_00628 0.93 0.91 0.96 78 57210 29 0 3 26 8
RFA_00630 0.66 0.66 0.66 57 56867 40 6 23 11 30
RFA_00805 0.55 0.55 0.56 83 133237 71 6 60 5 67
RFA_00814 0.79 0.80 0.77 33 25157 26 4 6 16 8
RFA_00816 0.59 0.66 0.53 27 23169 32 13 11 8 14
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21885 55 16 39 0 36
RFA_00818 0.59 0.63 0.55 26 20254 31 10 11 10 15
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 31 0 1 30 2
SRP_00241 0.54 0.59 0.51 48 45961 49 11 36 2 34
SRP_00257 0.86 0.87 0.85 94 50929 19 4 13 2 14
SRP_00308 0.58 0.58 0.59 51 36228 39 9 27 3 37
SRP_00328 0.64 0.66 0.63 56 39532 38 8 25 5 29
SRP_00329 0.75 0.74 0.75 63 39819 24 3 18 3 22
SRP_00331 0.66 0.66 0.66 57 37589 32 2 27 3 30
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41236 46 8 36 2 34

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.