CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAshapes
MCC 0.772 > 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.799 ± 0.075 > 0.574 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.750 > 0.603
Positive Predictive Value 0.796 > 0.585
Total TP 860 > 692
Total TN 607611 > 607508
Total FP 348 < 609
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 113
Total FP INCONS 180 < 378
Total FP COMP 128 > 118
Total FN 287 < 455
P-value 1.58287649515e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 860
Total TN 607611
Total FP 348
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 180
Total FP COMP 128
Total FN 287
Total Scores
MCC 0.772
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.799 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.750
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 692
Total TN 607508
Total FP 609
Total FP CONTRA 113
Total FP INCONS 378
Total FP COMP 118
Total FN 455
Total Scores
MCC 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.108
Sensitivity 0.603
Positive Predictive Value 0.585
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.55 0.55 0.55 36 27196 29 5 24 0 29
RFA_00626 0.45 0.45 0.46 39 56531 61 9 37 15 48
RFA_00627 0.63 0.61 0.66 53 56873 42 4 23 15 34
RFA_00628 0.82 0.80 0.84 69 57209 33 1 12 20 17
RFA_00814 0.62 0.63 0.60 26 25157 26 6 11 9 15
RFA_00816 0.21 0.24 0.18 10 23164 47 18 28 1 31
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21881 60 21 38 1 36
RFA_00818 0.52 0.56 0.48 23 20253 31 9 16 6 18
RFA_00819 0.84 0.80 0.87 33 27928 36 0 5 31 8
SRP_00241 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 45963 47 13 32 2 34
SRP_00257 0.86 0.83 0.88 90 50938 17 1 11 5 18
SRP_00308 0.57 0.56 0.58 49 36231 37 3 32 2 39
SRP_00328 0.64 0.65 0.63 55 39533 38 8 25 5 30
SRP_00329 0.67 0.66 0.67 56 39820 28 4 23 1 29
SRP_00331 0.63 0.61 0.66 53 37595 30 2 25 3 34
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.51 47 41236 47 9 36 2 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.