CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAsubopt
MCC 0.776 > 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.070 > 0.588 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.753 > 0.604
Positive Predictive Value 0.802 > 0.578
Total TP 929 > 745
Total TN 664485 > 664354
Total FP 370 < 699
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 125
Total FP INCONS 190 < 420
Total FP COMP 140 < 154
Total FN 305 < 489
P-value 2.41358941668e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 929
Total TN 664485
Total FP 370
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 190
Total FP COMP 140
Total FN 305
Total Scores
MCC 0.776
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.801 ± 0.070
Sensitivity 0.753
Positive Predictive Value 0.802
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 745
Total TN 664354
Total FP 699
Total FP CONTRA 125
Total FP INCONS 420
Total FP COMP 154
Total FN 489
Total Scores
MCC 0.590
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.604
Positive Predictive Value 0.578
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.47 0.48 0.47 31 27195 36 7 28 1 34
RFA_00626 0.68 0.66 0.70 57 56535 42 6 18 18 30
RFA_00627 0.72 0.68 0.77 59 56876 33 4 14 15 28
RFA_00628 0.89 0.86 0.91 74 57210 32 2 5 25 12
RFA_00630 0.58 0.60 0.57 52 56861 51 12 28 11 35
RFA_00814 0.39 0.39 0.39 16 25159 40 5 20 15 25
RFA_00816 0.74 0.78 0.70 32 23174 24 8 6 10 9
RFA_00817 0.35 0.41 0.30 17 21889 43 11 28 4 24
RFA_00818 0.47 0.54 0.41 22 20247 39 13 19 7 19
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 31 0 1 30 2
SRP_00241 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 45963 48 12 33 3 34
SRP_00257 0.80 0.81 0.79 87 50930 26 4 19 3 21
SRP_00308 0.06 0.07 0.06 6 36221 88 12 76 0 82
SRP_00328 0.64 0.66 0.63 56 39532 38 8 25 5 29
SRP_00329 0.61 0.62 0.60 53 39814 37 10 26 1 32
SRP_00331 0.55 0.55 0.55 48 37587 43 3 37 3 39
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41235 48 8 37 3 34

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.