CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.787 > 0.369
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.340 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.385
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.355
Total TP 1052 > 533
Total TN 797739 > 797528
Total FP 383 < 1207
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 196
Total FP INCONS 199 < 773
Total FP COMP 144 < 238
Total FN 332 < 851
P-value 2.9966815982e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 533
Total TN 797528
Total FP 1207
Total FP CONTRA 196
Total FP INCONS 773
Total FP COMP 238
Total FN 851
Total Scores
MCC 0.369
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.340 ± 0.105
Sensitivity 0.385
Positive Predictive Value 0.355
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.62 0.63 0.61 41 27194 39 9 17 13 24
RFA_00626 0.08 0.09 0.08 8 56511 99 24 73 2 79
RFA_00627 0.38 0.39 0.37 34 56862 73 13 44 16 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.57 0.59 49 57208 64 7 27 30 37
RFA_00630 0.48 0.47 0.49 41 56869 66 9 34 23 46
RFA_00805 0.30 0.31 0.29 47 133225 121 13 101 7 103
RFA_00814 0.20 0.22 0.18 9 25149 62 12 30 20 32
RFA_00816 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 23162 66 17 41 8 41
RFA_00817 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21892 57 12 41 4 41
RFA_00818 0.25 0.27 0.23 11 20253 51 12 25 14 30
RFA_00819 0.16 0.17 0.16 7 27921 70 6 32 32 34
SRP_00241 0.55 0.60 0.51 49 45959 61 14 34 13 33
SRP_00257 0.68 0.69 0.67 75 50928 49 5 32 12 33
SRP_00308 0.27 0.26 0.27 23 36231 62 13 48 1 65
SRP_00328 0.32 0.33 0.31 28 39530 68 12 51 5 57
SRP_00329 0.31 0.33 0.30 28 39810 75 5 60 10 57
SRP_00331 0.61 0.61 0.61 53 37588 49 3 31 15 34
SRP_00340 0.34 0.37 0.33 30 41236 75 10 52 13 52

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.