CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Sfold
MCC 0.787 > 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.658 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.644
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.701
Total TP 1052 > 891
Total TN 797739 < 797759
Total FP 383 < 500
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 96
Total FP INCONS 199 < 284
Total FP COMP 144 > 120
Total FN 332 < 493
P-value 2.76499031155e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Sfold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 891
Total TN 797759
Total FP 500
Total FP CONTRA 96
Total FP INCONS 284
Total FP COMP 120
Total FN 493
Total Scores
MCC 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.644
Positive Predictive Value 0.701
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.59 0.60 0.59 39 27195 27 6 21 0 26
RFA_00626 0.89 0.84 0.95 73 56539 20 1 3 16 14
RFA_00627 0.72 0.68 0.77 59 56876 30 4 14 12 28
RFA_00628 0.90 0.86 0.95 74 57213 28 0 4 24 12
RFA_00630 0.61 0.59 0.65 51 56874 38 7 21 10 36
RFA_00805 0.66 0.55 0.80 83 133282 25 1 20 4 67
RFA_00814 0.86 0.76 0.97 31 25168 10 0 1 9 10
RFA_00816 0.76 0.73 0.79 30 23182 12 8 0 4 11
RFA_00817 0.11 0.12 0.11 5 21899 41 14 27 0 36
RFA_00818 0.31 0.22 0.43 9 20280 13 8 4 1 32
RFA_00819 0.88 0.80 0.97 33 27932 25 0 1 24 8
SRP_00241 0.55 0.57 0.53 47 45967 44 11 31 2 35
SRP_00257 0.84 0.83 0.84 90 50933 19 4 13 2 18
SRP_00308 0.62 0.59 0.65 52 36235 30 8 20 2 36
SRP_00328 0.63 0.64 0.64 54 39536 34 7 24 3 31
SRP_00329 0.72 0.71 0.73 60 39821 25 3 19 3 25
SRP_00331 0.62 0.61 0.63 53 37591 33 6 25 2 34
SRP_00340 0.55 0.59 0.52 48 41236 46 8 36 2 34

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.