CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) UNAFold
MCC 0.787 > 0.651
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066 > 0.637 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.760 > 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.815 > 0.644
Total TP 1052 > 912
Total TN 797739 > 797613
Total FP 383 < 651
Total FP CONTRA 40 < 130
Total FP INCONS 199 < 375
Total FP COMP 144 < 146
Total FN 332 < 472
P-value 3.07760058607e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1052
Total TN 797739
Total FP 383
Total FP CONTRA 40
Total FP INCONS 199
Total FP COMP 144
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.787
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.805 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.760
Positive Predictive Value 0.815
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.71 0.68 0.75 44 27202 16 4 11 1 21
RFA_00626 0.90 0.85 0.95 74 56538 17 0 4 13 13
RFA_00627 0.85 0.82 0.89 71 56873 23 0 9 14 16
RFA_00628 0.92 0.90 0.95 77 57210 17 0 4 13 9
RFA_00630 0.83 0.79 0.87 69 56874 22 0 10 12 18
RFA_00805 0.87 0.82 0.93 123 133254 13 0 9 4 27
RFA_00814 0.92 0.85 1.00 35 25165 13 0 0 13 6
RFA_00816 1.00 1.00 1.00 41 23179 14 0 0 14 0
RFA_00817 0.95 0.90 1.00 37 21908 7 0 0 7 4
RFA_00818 0.85 0.80 0.89 33 20264 11 1 3 7 8
RFA_00819 0.98 0.95 1.00 39 27927 27 0 0 27 2
SRP_00241 0.56 0.59 0.54 48 45967 43 12 29 2 34
SRP_00257 0.78 0.72 0.85 78 50948 16 4 10 2 30
SRP_00308 0.76 0.74 0.77 65 36231 20 2 17 1 23
SRP_00328 0.69 0.67 0.70 57 39540 27 5 19 3 28
SRP_00329 0.65 0.64 0.67 54 39822 30 3 24 3 31
SRP_00331 0.67 0.66 0.68 57 37591 29 3 24 2 30
SRP_00340 0.61 0.61 0.61 50 41246 38 6 26 6 32

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 912
Total TN 797613
Total FP 651
Total FP CONTRA 130
Total FP INCONS 375
Total FP COMP 146
Total FN 472
Total Scores
MCC 0.651
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.659
Positive Predictive Value 0.644
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
ASE_00210 0.59 0.60 0.59 39 27195 28 6 21 1 26
RFA_00626 0.87 0.84 0.91 73 56536 32 2 5 25 14
RFA_00627 0.70 0.67 0.74 58 56875 36 4 16 16 29
RFA_00628 0.86 0.83 0.89 71 57211 31 1 8 22 15
RFA_00630 0.59 0.59 0.59 51 56866 48 8 28 12 36
RFA_00805 0.63 0.63 0.64 94 133239 53 13 40 0 56
RFA_00814 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 25158 23 4 6 13 9
RFA_00816 0.60 0.66 0.55 27 23171 30 13 9 8 14
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21882 58 18 40 0 36
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 46 19 26 1 32
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 28 0 1 27 2
SRP_00241 0.48 0.51 0.45 42 45963 53 14 37 2 40
SRP_00257 0.86 0.87 0.85 94 50929 19 4 13 2 14
SRP_00308 0.69 0.67 0.71 59 36232 28 4 20 4 29
SRP_00328 0.64 0.65 0.63 55 39534 37 7 25 5 30
SRP_00329 0.74 0.73 0.75 62 39820 24 3 18 3 23
SRP_00331 0.65 0.63 0.66 55 37592 31 2 26 3 32
SRP_00340 0.54 0.57 0.52 47 41237 46 8 36 2 35

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.