CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.619 > 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.067 > 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.617 > 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.623 < 0.762
Total TP 2840 > 1249
Total TN 2620130 < 2623051
Total FP 2112 > 419
Total FP CONTRA 352 > 30
Total FP INCONS 1368 > 360
Total FP COMP 392 > 29
Total FN 1763 < 3354
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2840
Total TN 2620130
Total FP 2112
Total FP CONTRA 352
Total FP INCONS 1368
Total FP COMP 392
Total FN 1763
Total Scores
MCC 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.617
Positive Predictive Value 0.623
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.24 0.24 0.24 28 103624 107 18 70 19 87
CRW_00016 0.62 0.57 0.67 68 77320 45 5 28 12 52
CRW_00610 0.45 0.44 0.46 36 36236 43 6 37 0 45
CRW_00613 0.63 0.58 0.68 45 34914 29 1 20 8 33
CRW_00614 0.09 0.11 0.08 6 121694 140 20 51 69 51
CRW_00618 0.18 0.20 0.17 12 56210 83 10 48 25 49
CRW_00633 0.69 0.67 0.71 71 63446 33 8 21 4 35
CRW_00634 0.33 0.34 0.33 32 64522 70 14 52 4 62
CRW_00670 0.79 0.74 0.83 89 70018 21 6 12 3 31
CRW_00671 0.65 0.62 0.68 72 62729 39 7 27 5 45
CRW_00672 0.48 0.49 0.47 54 72275 65 19 42 4 57
CRW_00674 0.58 0.56 0.62 69 83324 45 7 36 2 55
CRW_00676 0.54 0.55 0.53 63 93410 69 15 40 14 52
CRW_00692 0.20 0.21 0.19 19 68537 84 24 55 5 71
PDB_00827 0.58 0.52 0.66 42 26964 23 1 21 1 39
RFA_00606 0.67 0.67 0.68 26 21283 25 7 5 13 13
RFA_00620 0.67 0.64 0.69 25 21909 24 3 8 13 14
RFA_00626 0.87 0.84 0.91 73 56536 32 2 5 25 14
RFA_00627 0.70 0.67 0.74 58 56875 36 4 16 16 29
RFA_00628 0.86 0.83 0.89 71 57211 31 1 8 22 15
RFA_00630 0.59 0.59 0.59 51 56866 48 8 28 12 36
RFA_00639 0.17 0.18 0.16 16 54518 83 18 63 2 71
RFA_00814 0.77 0.78 0.76 32 25158 23 4 6 13 9
RFA_00815 0.56 0.61 0.51 25 24482 36 8 16 12 16
RFA_00816 0.60 0.66 0.55 27 23171 30 13 9 8 14
RFA_00817 0.10 0.12 0.08 5 21882 58 18 40 0 36
RFA_00818 0.19 0.22 0.17 9 20247 46 19 26 1 32
RFA_00819 0.96 0.95 0.98 39 27926 28 0 1 27 2
SRP_00016 0.91 0.87 0.94 95 47794 8 0 6 2 14
SRP_00130 0.27 0.27 0.27 26 49675 69 10 59 0 71
SRP_00142 0.59 0.60 0.58 56 45960 42 5 35 2 37
SRP_00143 0.85 0.84 0.86 85 49671 19 1 13 5 16
SRP_00144 0.74 0.73 0.75 69 46573 30 1 22 7 25
SRP_00197 0.44 0.43 0.45 43 49360 53 4 48 1 58
SRP_00198 0.34 0.34 0.35 35 50940 66 4 61 1 68
SRP_00199 0.65 0.65 0.66 68 50937 36 3 32 1 37
SRP_00201 0.94 0.92 0.95 102 47788 7 0 5 2 9
SRP_00202 0.97 0.95 0.98 111 54172 4 0 2 2 6
SRP_00203 0.73 0.75 0.72 79 48718 37 3 28 6 26
SRP_00204 0.60 0.61 0.60 62 49038 42 7 34 1 40
SRP_00206 0.82 0.81 0.83 87 47790 19 5 13 1 21
SRP_00208 0.85 0.81 0.88 82 46572 14 1 10 3 19
SRP_00255 0.60 0.62 0.59 58 47487 46 3 38 5 36
SRP_00276 0.87 0.85 0.88 94 50614 14 5 8 1 16
SRP_00278 0.77 0.76 0.78 80 45954 23 5 17 1 25
SRP_00321 0.64 0.64 0.65 69 47480 38 7 30 1 39
SRP_00322 0.61 0.61 0.60 67 48405 45 6 38 1 42
SRP_00323 0.93 0.92 0.94 98 47174 8 0 6 2 9
SRP_00330 0.63 0.64 0.63 61 49989 40 4 32 4 34
SRP_00332 0.84 0.85 0.83 90 50295 19 6 12 1 16
SRP_00339 0.64 0.64 0.64 60 44457 37 6 28 3 34

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1249
Total TN 2623051
Total FP 419
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 360
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 3354
Total Scores
MCC 0.454
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.456 ± 0.042
Sensitivity 0.271
Positive Predictive Value 0.762
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00618 0.36 0.13 1.00 8 56272 0 0 0 0 53
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00634 0.40 0.17 0.94 16 64603 1 0 1 0 78
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
RFA_00606 0.34 0.21 0.57 8 21307 8 2 4 2 31
RFA_00620 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 21939 6 0 6 0 39
RFA_00626 0.44 0.32 0.60 28 56569 22 2 17 3 59
RFA_00627 0.53 0.39 0.72 34 56906 15 3 10 2 53
RFA_00628 0.58 0.43 0.77 37 57243 14 3 8 3 49
RFA_00630 0.45 0.32 0.64 28 56909 17 3 13 1 59
RFA_00639 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 54575 44 6 34 4 87
RFA_00814 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 25177 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00815 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 24508 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00816 0.68 0.51 0.91 21 23197 2 0 2 0 20
RFA_00817 0.68 0.56 0.82 23 21917 5 0 5 0 18
RFA_00818 0.60 0.49 0.74 20 20274 8 1 6 1 21
RFA_00819 0.62 0.51 0.75 21 27938 7 0 7 0 20
SRP_00016 0.54 0.35 0.83 38 47849 8 0 8 0 71
SRP_00130 0.50 0.32 0.78 31 49730 10 1 8 1 66
SRP_00142 0.46 0.37 0.58 34 45997 26 1 24 1 59
SRP_00143 0.50 0.30 0.86 30 49735 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00144 0.54 0.37 0.80 35 46621 11 0 9 2 59
SRP_00197 0.46 0.26 0.84 26 49424 5 0 5 0 75
SRP_00198 0.56 0.37 0.84 38 50995 7 0 7 0 65
SRP_00199 0.54 0.35 0.82 37 50995 8 0 8 0 68
SRP_00201 0.54 0.35 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 72
SRP_00202 0.43 0.21 0.86 25 54256 4 0 4 0 92
SRP_00203 0.51 0.34 0.77 36 48781 12 0 11 1 69
SRP_00204 0.52 0.34 0.80 35 49097 9 1 8 0 67
SRP_00206 0.55 0.36 0.83 39 47848 8 0 8 0 69
SRP_00208 0.52 0.33 0.83 33 46625 7 1 6 0 68
SRP_00255 0.49 0.27 0.89 25 47558 3 0 3 0 69
SRP_00276 0.51 0.33 0.80 36 50676 9 0 9 0 74
SRP_00278 0.52 0.33 0.81 35 46013 8 0 8 0 70
SRP_00321 0.42 0.21 0.82 23 47558 5 1 4 0 85
SRP_00322 0.52 0.33 0.82 36 48472 8 0 8 0 73
SRP_00323 0.54 0.34 0.88 36 47237 5 0 5 0 71
SRP_00330 0.44 0.23 0.85 22 50060 5 0 4 1 73
SRP_00332 0.44 0.25 0.75 27 50367 9 0 9 0 79
SRP_00339 0.56 0.39 0.79 37 44504 10 2 8 0 57

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.