CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & PPfold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) PPfold(20)
MCC 0.848 > 0.820
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.849 ± 0.051 > 0.822 ± 0.054
Sensitivity 0.776 > 0.766
Positive Predictive Value 0.926 > 0.879
Total TP 1483 > 1463
Total TN 4652301 > 4652238
Total FP 172 < 286
Total FP CONTRA 28 < 39
Total FP INCONS 90 < 162
Total FP COMP 54 < 85
Total FN 428 < 448
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and PPfold(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1483
Total TN 4652301
Total FP 172
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 90
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 428
Total Scores
MCC 0.848
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.849 ± 0.051
Sensitivity 0.776
Positive Predictive Value 0.926
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.86 0.80 0.93 374 1192336 40 9 21 10 94
CRW_00590 0.87 0.81 0.93 364 1119366 44 2 24 18 88
CRW_00997 0.87 0.81 0.93 377 1135871 39 9 21 9 87
PDB_01120 0.80 0.70 0.92 368 1204728 49 8 24 17 159

^top



Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1463
Total TN 4652238
Total FP 286
Total FP CONTRA 39
Total FP INCONS 162
Total FP COMP 85
Total FN 448
Total Scores
MCC 0.820
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.822 ± 0.054
Sensitivity 0.766
Positive Predictive Value 0.879
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.