CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) Afold
MCC 0.621 > 0.409
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161 > 0.410 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.411
Total TP 2368 > 1769
Total TN 12465477 > 12464521
Total FP 1159 < 2830
Total FP CONTRA 149 < 384
Total FP INCONS 828 < 2148
Total FP COMP 182 < 298
Total FN 1981 < 2580
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1769
Total TN 12464521
Total FP 2830
Total FP CONTRA 384
Total FP INCONS 2148
Total FP COMP 298
Total FN 2580
Total Scores
MCC 0.409
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.410 ± 0.079
Sensitivity 0.407
Positive Predictive Value 0.411
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.44 0.43 0.45 203 1178433 259 22 222 15 270
CRW_00250 0.44 0.44 0.45 210 1198459 274 34 223 17 268
CRW_00278 0.41 0.40 0.42 180 1129825 274 33 218 23 270
CRW_00280 0.51 0.50 0.51 227 1117817 231 28 188 15 226
CRW_00330 0.32 0.32 0.31 167 1988474 452 69 305 78 350
CRW_00411 0.34 0.34 0.34 169 1615006 381 62 266 53 327
CRW_00414 0.27 0.28 0.26 140 1665694 436 77 314 45 355
CRW_00789 0.36 0.36 0.36 160 1137342 302 44 240 18 287
PDB_01105 0.60 0.58 0.63 313 1433471 221 15 172 34 227

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.