CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) Fold
MCC 0.621 > 0.371
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161 > 0.372 ± 0.050
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.375
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.368
Total TP 2368 > 1629
Total TN 12465477 > 12464395
Total FP 1159 < 3110
Total FP CONTRA 149 < 421
Total FP INCONS 828 < 2377
Total FP COMP 182 < 312
Total FN 1981 < 2720
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1629
Total TN 12464395
Total FP 3110
Total FP CONTRA 421
Total FP INCONS 2377
Total FP COMP 312
Total FN 2720
Total Scores
MCC 0.371
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.372 ± 0.050
Sensitivity 0.375
Positive Predictive Value 0.368
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.49 0.48 0.50 226 1178426 251 26 202 23 247
CRW_00250 0.37 0.38 0.37 181 1198432 321 48 265 8 297
CRW_00278 0.36 0.35 0.37 159 1129828 293 31 238 24 291
CRW_00280 0.33 0.33 0.32 151 1117794 327 43 272 12 302
CRW_00330 0.31 0.32 0.30 166 1988453 469 82 314 73 351
CRW_00411 0.35 0.36 0.34 177 1614982 392 60 284 48 319
CRW_00414 0.29 0.31 0.28 152 1665688 448 68 317 63 343
CRW_00789 0.39 0.38 0.39 172 1137342 303 31 241 31 275
PDB_01105 0.46 0.45 0.47 245 1433450 306 32 244 30 295

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.