CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) IPknot
MCC 0.621 > 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161 > 0.537 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.616
Total TP 2368 > 2026
Total TN 12465477 < 12465534
Total FP 1159 < 1493
Total FP CONTRA 149 < 180
Total FP INCONS 828 < 1082
Total FP COMP 182 < 231
Total FN 1981 < 2323
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2026
Total TN 12465534
Total FP 1493
Total FP CONTRA 180
Total FP INCONS 1082
Total FP COMP 231
Total FN 2323
Total Scores
MCC 0.536
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.466
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.59 0.53 0.65 252 1178495 145 17 116 12 221
CRW_00250 0.57 0.52 0.63 250 1198526 164 23 127 14 228
CRW_00278 0.60 0.48 0.74 218 1129962 95 5 71 19 232
CRW_00280 0.67 0.58 0.77 265 1117916 90 11 68 11 188
CRW_00330 0.35 0.31 0.39 160 1988600 320 42 213 65 357
CRW_00411 0.40 0.34 0.46 170 1615137 238 31 165 42 326
CRW_00414 0.41 0.33 0.51 163 1665906 188 30 126 32 332
CRW_00789 0.55 0.46 0.66 206 1137473 121 11 96 14 241
PDB_01105 0.69 0.63 0.76 342 1433519 132 10 100 22 198

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.