CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) PknotsRG
MCC 0.758 > 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.021 > 0.436 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.683 > 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.842 > 0.443
Total TP 1940 > 1232
Total TN 7195774 > 7195295
Total FP 476 < 1657
Total FP CONTRA 62 < 199
Total FP INCONS 303 < 1353
Total FP COMP 111 > 105
Total FN 901 < 1609
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1940
Total TN 7195774
Total FP 476
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 303
Total FP COMP 111
Total FN 901
Total Scores
MCC 0.758
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.759 ± 0.021
Sensitivity 0.683
Positive Predictive Value 0.842
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1232
Total TN 7195295
Total FP 1657
Total FP CONTRA 199
Total FP INCONS 1353
Total FP COMP 105
Total FN 1609
Total Scores
MCC 0.438
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.436 ± 0.063
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.443
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.42 0.41 0.42 196 1178413 284 31 240 13 277
CRW_00250 0.43 0.43 0.43 205 1198449 287 30 242 15 273
CRW_00278 0.41 0.40 0.42 180 1129825 270 35 216 19 270
CRW_00280 0.50 0.50 0.51 226 1117813 234 28 193 13 227
CRW_00789 0.35 0.35 0.35 156 1137342 304 48 240 16 291
PDB_01105 0.51 0.50 0.52 269 1433453 278 27 222 29 271

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.