CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.621 > 0.419
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161 > 0.423 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.544 > 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.708 > 0.420
Total TP 2368 > 1820
Total TN 12465477 > 12464490
Total FP 1159 < 2765
Total FP CONTRA 149 < 379
Total FP INCONS 828 < 2133
Total FP COMP 182 < 253
Total FN 1981 < 2529
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2368
Total TN 12465477
Total FP 1159
Total FP CONTRA 149
Total FP INCONS 828
Total FP COMP 182
Total FN 1981
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.620 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.75 0.70 0.81 330 1178473 93 14 63 16 143
CRW_00250 0.75 0.68 0.84 325 1198537 73 14 50 9 153
CRW_00278 0.75 0.67 0.83 302 1129893 75 12 49 14 148
CRW_00280 0.78 0.72 0.85 328 1117874 75 11 47 17 125
CRW_00330 0.39 0.31 0.49 160 1988690 189 26 139 24 357
CRW_00411 0.31 0.25 0.40 122 1615195 206 23 163 20 374
CRW_00414 0.33 0.29 0.36 146 1665818 288 38 223 27 349
CRW_00789 0.78 0.71 0.86 318 1137416 79 8 44 27 129
PDB_01105 0.73 0.62 0.86 337 1433581 81 3 50 28 203

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1820
Total TN 12464490
Total FP 2765
Total FP CONTRA 379
Total FP INCONS 2133
Total FP COMP 253
Total FN 2529
Total Scores
MCC 0.419
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.423 ± 0.111
Sensitivity 0.418
Positive Predictive Value 0.420
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00177 0.51 0.49 0.53 234 1178440 221 29 177 15 239
CRW_00250 0.39 0.39 0.39 186 1198451 301 43 246 12 292
CRW_00278 0.43 0.41 0.44 186 1129832 259 29 209 21 264
CRW_00280 0.68 0.67 0.68 302 1117819 159 19 120 20 151
CRW_00330 0.29 0.31 0.28 158 1988457 459 73 327 59 359
CRW_00411 0.27 0.28 0.27 138 1614990 413 60 315 38 358
CRW_00414 0.30 0.31 0.29 154 1665688 426 77 306 43 341
CRW_00789 0.34 0.33 0.34 147 1137356 300 35 248 17 300
PDB_01105 0.60 0.58 0.61 315 1433457 227 14 185 28 225

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.