CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & PPfold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) PPfold(20)
MCC 0.751 > 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.753 ± 0.132 > 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.717 > 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.786 < 0.818
Total TP 2095 > 1989
Total TN 7954711 < 7954946
Total FP 781 > 607
Total FP CONTRA 96 > 71
Total FP INCONS 475 > 371
Total FP COMP 210 > 165
Total FN 825 < 931
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PPfold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PPfold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PPfold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PPfold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and PPfold(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 2095
Total TN 7954711
Total FP 781
Total FP CONTRA 96
Total FP INCONS 475
Total FP COMP 210
Total FN 825
Total Scores
MCC 0.751
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.753 ± 0.132
Sensitivity 0.717
Positive Predictive Value 0.786
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.83 0.81 0.85 379 1192296 87 16 49 22 89
CRW_00326 0.64 0.60 0.68 299 1627669 193 22 120 51 203
CRW_00358 0.56 0.53 0.60 269 1674914 228 29 153 46 238
CRW_00590 0.87 0.84 0.89 381 1119329 87 4 42 41 71
CRW_00997 0.85 0.84 0.85 389 1135822 85 16 51 18 75
PDB_01120 0.78 0.72 0.85 378 1204681 101 9 60 32 149

^top



Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.