CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Carnac(20)
MCC 0.746 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.561 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.338
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 < 0.940
Total TP 1989 > 987
Total TN 7954946 < 7956327
Total FP 607 > 136
Total FP CONTRA 71 > 12
Total FP INCONS 371 > 51
Total FP COMP 165 > 73
Total FN 931 < 1933
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Carnac(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Carnac(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 987
Total TN 7956327
Total FP 136
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 1933
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.561 ± 0.077
Sensitivity 0.338
Positive Predictive Value 0.940
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.64 0.43 0.97 200 1192533 11 3 4 4 268
CRW_00326 0.45 0.23 0.92 113 1627987 32 1 9 22 389
CRW_00358 0.49 0.25 0.96 129 1675231 29 0 5 24 378
CRW_00590 0.55 0.33 0.93 148 1119597 15 1 10 4 304
CRW_00997 0.60 0.39 0.93 181 1136084 19 3 10 6 283
PDB_01120 0.62 0.41 0.93 216 1204895 30 4 13 13 311

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.