CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.746 > 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.487 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.419
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.565
Total TP 1989 > 1224
Total TN 7954946 < 7955211
Total FP 607 < 1096
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 148
Total FP INCONS 371 < 794
Total FP COMP 165 > 154
Total FN 931 < 1696
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1224
Total TN 7955211
Total FP 1096
Total FP CONTRA 148
Total FP INCONS 794
Total FP COMP 154
Total FN 1696
Total Scores
MCC 0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.419
Positive Predictive Value 0.565
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.45 0.35 0.57 165 1192449 145 20 106 19 303
CRW_00326 0.57 0.48 0.67 240 1627752 163 19 99 45 262
CRW_00358 0.42 0.39 0.45 200 1674917 285 39 209 37 307
CRW_00590 0.37 0.32 0.43 143 1119420 207 36 157 14 309
CRW_00997 0.63 0.55 0.72 256 1135921 119 15 86 18 208
PDB_01120 0.49 0.42 0.59 220 1204752 177 19 137 21 307

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.