CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Contrafold
MCC 0.746 > 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.472 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.453
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.489
Total TP 1989 > 1323
Total TN 7954946 > 7954670
Total FP 607 < 1590
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 215
Total FP INCONS 371 < 1169
Total FP COMP 165 < 206
Total FN 931 < 1597
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Contrafold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Contrafold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1323
Total TN 7954670
Total FP 1590
Total FP CONTRA 215
Total FP INCONS 1169
Total FP COMP 206
Total FN 1597
Total Scores
MCC 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.472 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.453
Positive Predictive Value 0.489
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.47 0.44 0.50 206 1192327 232 26 181 25 262
CRW_00326 0.50 0.49 0.51 246 1627630 284 52 182 50 256
CRW_00358 0.39 0.40 0.38 202 1674827 390 57 279 54 305
CRW_00590 0.36 0.35 0.38 157 1119345 281 41 213 27 295
CRW_00997 0.62 0.60 0.64 280 1135838 187 19 141 27 184
PDB_01120 0.49 0.44 0.55 232 1204703 216 20 173 23 295

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.