CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Fold
MCC 0.746 > 0.375
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.376 ± 0.040
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.375
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.375
Total TP 1989 > 1096
Total TN 7954946 > 7954456
Total FP 607 < 1989
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 288
Total FP INCONS 371 < 1537
Total FP COMP 165 > 164
Total FN 931 < 1824
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Fold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Fold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1096
Total TN 7954456
Total FP 1989
Total FP CONTRA 288
Total FP INCONS 1537
Total FP COMP 164
Total FN 1824
Total Scores
MCC 0.375
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.376 ± 0.040
Sensitivity 0.375
Positive Predictive Value 0.375
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.39 0.39 0.40 183 1192281 294 41 235 18 285
CRW_00326 0.40 0.40 0.39 203 1627589 370 67 251 52 299
CRW_00358 0.36 0.37 0.35 186 1674831 392 68 280 44 321
CRW_00590 0.42 0.42 0.42 191 1119306 279 34 225 20 261
CRW_00997 0.37 0.38 0.37 175 1135806 315 41 256 18 289
PDB_01120 0.31 0.30 0.33 158 1204643 339 37 290 12 369

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.