CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) IPknot
MCC 0.746 > 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.543 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.628
Total TP 1989 > 1355
Total TN 7954946 < 7955221
Total FP 607 < 927
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 146
Total FP INCONS 371 < 655
Total FP COMP 165 > 126
Total FN 931 < 1565
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and IPknot).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and IPknot).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1355
Total TN 7955221
Total FP 927
Total FP CONTRA 146
Total FP INCONS 655
Total FP COMP 126
Total FN 1565
Total Scores
MCC 0.540
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.543 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.628
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.56 0.44 0.71 207 1192448 104 18 67 19 261
CRW_00326 0.53 0.43 0.66 216 1627783 139 27 84 28 286
CRW_00358 0.39 0.34 0.43 174 1674963 268 35 193 40 333
CRW_00590 0.53 0.48 0.59 217 1119386 165 27 126 12 235
CRW_00997 0.68 0.62 0.75 289 1135893 113 17 79 17 175
PDB_01120 0.56 0.48 0.66 252 1204748 138 22 106 10 275

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.