CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RNAalifold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RNAalifold(20)
MCC 0.746 > 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.677 ± 0.215
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.618
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.739
Total TP 1989 > 1806
Total TN 7954946 > 7954934
Total FP 607 < 746
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 115
Total FP INCONS 371 < 522
Total FP COMP 165 > 109
Total FN 931 < 1114
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RNAalifold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAalifold(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAalifold(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RNAalifold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAalifold(20)).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1806
Total TN 7954934
Total FP 746
Total FP CONTRA 115
Total FP INCONS 522
Total FP COMP 109
Total FN 1114
Total Scores
MCC 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.677 ± 0.215
Sensitivity 0.618
Positive Predictive Value 0.739
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192322 68 14 41 13 105
CRW_00326 0.41 0.35 0.47 178 1627730 219 36 166 17 324
CRW_00358 0.43 0.38 0.49 192 1674972 227 34 167 26 315
CRW_00590 0.84 0.79 0.89 358 1119354 70 6 38 26 94
CRW_00997 0.84 0.81 0.88 374 1135854 61 12 38 11 90
PDB_01120 0.72 0.65 0.80 341 1204702 101 13 72 16 186

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.