CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RNAfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RNAfold
MCC 0.746 > 0.424
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.425 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.420
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.428
Total TP 1989 > 1227
Total TN 7954946 > 7954512
Total FP 607 < 1810
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 268
Total FP INCONS 371 < 1370
Total FP COMP 165 < 172
Total FN 931 < 1693
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RNAfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RNAfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAfold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of RNAfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1227
Total TN 7954512
Total FP 1810
Total FP CONTRA 268
Total FP INCONS 1370
Total FP COMP 172
Total FN 1693
Total Scores
MCC 0.424
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.425 ± 0.110
Sensitivity 0.420
Positive Predictive Value 0.428
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.41 0.41 0.42 190 1192286 279 40 224 15 278
CRW_00326 0.38 0.38 0.37 190 1627600 364 68 252 44 312
CRW_00358 0.39 0.39 0.38 199 1674839 381 67 260 54 308
CRW_00590 0.31 0.31 0.31 138 1119315 322 37 266 19 314
CRW_00997 0.62 0.61 0.62 282 1135826 195 25 145 25 182
PDB_01120 0.45 0.43 0.47 228 1204646 269 31 223 15 299

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.