CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & Sfold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) Sfold
MCC 0.746 > 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.486 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.397
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.580
Total TP 1989 > 1158
Total TN 7954946 < 7955382
Total FP 607 < 952
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 147
Total FP INCONS 371 < 690
Total FP COMP 165 > 115
Total FN 931 < 1762
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and Sfold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Sfold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Sfold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and Sfold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and Sfold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of Sfold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1158
Total TN 7955382
Total FP 952
Total FP CONTRA 147
Total FP INCONS 690
Total FP COMP 115
Total FN 1762
Total Scores
MCC 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.486 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.397
Positive Predictive Value 0.580
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.37 0.33 0.42 155 1192370 232 35 180 17 313
CRW_00326 0.46 0.37 0.56 187 1627778 175 32 113 30 315
CRW_00358 0.38 0.33 0.43 166 1674980 241 44 175 22 341
CRW_00590 0.58 0.40 0.84 179 1119542 50 5 30 15 273
CRW_00997 0.59 0.52 0.66 241 1135913 144 19 105 20 223
PDB_01120 0.55 0.44 0.70 230 1204799 110 12 87 11 297

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.