CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) UNAFold
MCC 0.746 > 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127 > 0.443 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.818 > 0.452
Total TP 1989 > 1257
Total TN 7954946 > 7954594
Total FP 607 < 1701
Total FP CONTRA 71 < 248
Total FP INCONS 371 < 1278
Total FP COMP 165 < 175
Total FN 931 < 1663
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and UNAFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and UNAFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1989
Total TN 7954946
Total FP 607
Total FP CONTRA 71
Total FP INCONS 371
Total FP COMP 165
Total FN 931
Total Scores
MCC 0.746
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.818
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.82 0.78 0.87 363 1192324 70 13 40 17 105
CRW_00326 0.64 0.56 0.73 280 1627728 143 17 85 41 222
CRW_00358 0.56 0.49 0.64 246 1674980 178 15 124 39 261
CRW_00590 0.85 0.81 0.90 367 1119348 69 4 37 28 85
CRW_00997 0.83 0.81 0.86 374 1135845 75 15 44 16 90
PDB_01120 0.78 0.68 0.88 359 1204721 72 7 41 24 168

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1257
Total TN 7954594
Total FP 1701
Total FP CONTRA 248
Total FP INCONS 1278
Total FP COMP 175
Total FN 1663
Total Scores
MCC 0.441
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.443 ± 0.102
Sensitivity 0.430
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00256 0.50 0.49 0.52 228 1192304 228 35 173 20 240
CRW_00326 0.35 0.35 0.35 176 1627600 377 65 269 43 326
CRW_00358 0.39 0.39 0.39 200 1674848 370 67 250 53 307
CRW_00590 0.35 0.34 0.37 153 1119337 287 30 236 21 299
CRW_00997 0.59 0.58 0.61 268 1135838 197 24 148 25 196
PDB_01120 0.47 0.44 0.50 232 1204667 242 27 202 13 295

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.