CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) CentroidFold
MCC 0.750 > 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.039 > 0.519 ± 0.026
Sensitivity 0.684 > 0.451
Positive Predictive Value 0.822 > 0.602
Total TP 21590 > 14229
Total TN 83640132 < 83642764
Total FP 5690 < 11008
Total FP CONTRA 1075 < 1319
Total FP INCONS 3614 < 8099
Total FP COMP 1001 < 1590
Total FN 9978 < 17339
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 21590
Total TN 83640132
Total FP 5690
Total FP CONTRA 1075
Total FP INCONS 3614
Total FP COMP 1001
Total FN 9978
Total Scores
MCC 0.750
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.747 ± 0.039
Sensitivity 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.822
Nr of predictions 67

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00024 0.87 0.84 0.90 385 1085175 58 7 34 17 73
CRW_00034 0.82 0.77 0.88 363 1141905 62 14 34 14 111
CRW_00048 0.84 0.79 0.88 372 1170793 59 16 34 9 98
CRW_00054 0.84 0.81 0.88 369 1107397 60 16 34 10 87
CRW_00059 0.82 0.78 0.88 367 1172327 61 16 36 9 106
CRW_00061 0.82 0.77 0.88 367 1181535 61 16 35 10 109
CRW_00068 0.85 0.81 0.88 370 1108886 58 15 34 9 87
CRW_00096 0.84 0.79 0.89 368 1178465 61 12 35 14 97
CRW_00140 0.83 0.79 0.87 367 1135858 62 16 37 9 96
CRW_00141 0.83 0.78 0.88 369 1201606 61 16 34 11 107
CRW_00150 0.85 0.79 0.91 368 1152515 47 13 25 9 98
CRW_00152 0.85 0.79 0.91 372 1180006 46 13 25 8 99
CRW_00166 0.83 0.78 0.88 365 1190782 64 12 37 15 103
CRW_00173 0.79 0.76 0.84 336 1082254 76 16 50 10 109
CRW_00177 0.82 0.77 0.87 364 1178460 66 16 40 10 109
CRW_00196 0.82 0.77 0.87 365 1207815 63 16 39 8 110
CRW_00230 0.83 0.77 0.88 369 1198508 59 15 34 10 109
CRW_00245 0.84 0.81 0.88 366 1105912 60 16 34 10 87
CRW_00248 0.82 0.76 0.88 369 1218720 61 16 36 9 115
CRW_00250 0.82 0.77 0.88 369 1198505 61 16 36 9 109
CRW_00256 0.85 0.79 0.91 369 1192333 48 13 25 10 99
CRW_00270 0.84 0.81 0.88 368 1111868 59 15 35 9 87
CRW_00271 0.83 0.78 0.90 359 1122350 51 13 29 9 103
CRW_00273 0.84 0.80 0.87 358 1085191 60 16 36 8 88
CRW_00275 0.84 0.80 0.88 366 1114854 59 16 35 8 91
CRW_00277 0.83 0.79 0.87 359 1110382 64 17 37 10 94
CRW_00278 0.83 0.78 0.88 349 1129861 58 13 33 12 101
CRW_00279 0.85 0.80 0.91 372 1180005 54 13 26 15 92
CRW_00280 0.84 0.80 0.89 363 1117851 59 13 33 13 90
CRW_00281 0.85 0.80 0.91 372 1144932 48 13 24 11 92
CRW_00283 0.80 0.75 0.85 323 1015644 67 14 44 9 109
CRW_00284 0.83 0.78 0.89 356 1131358 59 13 33 13 100
CRW_00285 0.82 0.78 0.86 356 1117847 66 17 40 9 102
CRW_00289 0.80 0.75 0.86 358 1189235 67 16 44 7 118
CRW_00292 0.77 0.71 0.84 329 1123856 76 14 51 11 132
CRW_00306 0.45 0.39 0.52 178 1445508 175 32 132 11 284
CRW_00326 0.44 0.37 0.53 184 1627762 174 32 132 10 318
CRW_00358 0.44 0.36 0.53 184 1675017 173 32 132 9 323
CRW_00366 0.42 0.36 0.51 172 1579413 180 32 136 12 310
CRW_00371 0.44 0.36 0.52 181 1611565 175 31 133 11 315
CRW_00372 0.44 0.37 0.53 184 1625958 174 32 132 10 314
CRW_00386 0.44 0.35 0.55 182 1750923 164 28 123 13 333
CRW_00411 0.45 0.38 0.55 186 1615165 163 28 124 11 310
CRW_00414 0.45 0.37 0.54 182 1665890 171 28 125 18 313
CRW_00466 0.86 0.82 0.91 377 1116350 49 12 26 11 81
CRW_00589 0.86 0.81 0.92 361 1094068 53 6 25 22 84
CRW_00590 0.87 0.81 0.92 366 1119360 52 6 24 22 86
CRW_00591 0.87 0.82 0.92 365 1098507 56 8 23 25 81
CRW_00759 0.41 0.34 0.49 163 1636811 183 35 136 12 318
CRW_00763 0.85 0.78 0.92 348 1215641 59 6 25 28 98
CRW_00772 0.81 0.75 0.88 302 945656 72 5 37 30 102
CRW_00778 0.86 0.81 0.91 312 1201683 85 4 26 55 72
CRW_00789 0.85 0.79 0.91 355 1137395 59 8 28 23 92
CRW_00795 0.78 0.73 0.84 288 1152577 109 10 46 53 106
CRW_00800 0.42 0.33 0.52 156 1401675 160 25 119 16 314
CRW_00849 0.82 0.76 0.88 356 1117856 63 14 34 15 114
CRW_00997 0.84 0.80 0.88 372 1135856 59 15 35 9 92
CRW_01153 0.41 0.34 0.49 172 1606179 193 36 141 16 331
CRW_01171 0.43 0.36 0.52 181 1593657 177 34 133 10 325
CRW_01343 0.83 0.79 0.88 344 977508 71 5 44 22 90
PDB_00703 0.78 0.69 0.87 344 1073448 73 7 46 20 151
PDB_00854 0.74 0.64 0.87 342 1500383 85 10 43 32 193
PDB_01088 0.73 0.63 0.86 342 1471073 85 8 47 30 205
PDB_01103 0.74 0.63 0.87 355 1606120 72 10 43 19 207
PDB_01105 0.76 0.66 0.88 355 1433566 72 7 43 22 185
PDB_01120 0.77 0.68 0.87 358 1204715 73 7 48 18 169
PDB_01273 0.78 0.70 0.86 346 1117856 80 13 45 22 145

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 14229
Total TN 83642764
Total FP 11008
Total FP CONTRA 1319
Total FP INCONS 8099
Total FP COMP 1590
Total FN 17339
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.519 ± 0.026
Sensitivity 0.451
Positive Predictive Value 0.602
Nr of predictions 67

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00024 0.79 0.76 0.83 347 1085183 108 8 63 37 111
CRW_00034 0.68 0.66 0.71 312 1141875 159 19 110 30 162
CRW_00048 0.60 0.49 0.75 230 1170907 91 8 70 13 240
CRW_00054 0.56 0.49 0.64 223 1107466 140 16 111 13 233
CRW_00059 0.60 0.51 0.71 241 1172408 111 9 88 14 232
CRW_00061 0.64 0.57 0.72 269 1181581 110 23 80 7 207
CRW_00068 0.55 0.49 0.63 225 1108945 147 19 116 12 232
CRW_00096 0.56 0.49 0.63 228 1178519 155 15 118 22 237
CRW_00140 0.59 0.49 0.70 226 1135957 106 11 84 11 237
CRW_00141 0.63 0.56 0.70 268 1201642 136 16 99 21 208
CRW_00150 0.55 0.47 0.66 217 1152591 126 17 96 13 249
CRW_00152 0.51 0.42 0.62 200 1180095 129 14 107 8 271
CRW_00166 0.61 0.53 0.70 247 1190845 120 6 98 16 221
CRW_00173 0.35 0.31 0.39 139 1082299 226 23 195 8 306
CRW_00177 0.52 0.45 0.59 213 1178522 162 17 128 17 260
CRW_00196 0.59 0.52 0.67 247 1207869 131 18 101 12 228
CRW_00230 0.59 0.52 0.67 250 1198552 140 19 105 16 228
CRW_00245 0.56 0.49 0.65 221 1105989 128 13 105 10 232
CRW_00248 0.66 0.61 0.71 296 1218724 154 20 101 33 188
CRW_00250 0.57 0.50 0.66 237 1198568 130 20 101 9 241
CRW_00256 0.45 0.35 0.57 165 1192449 145 20 106 19 303
CRW_00270 0.67 0.57 0.79 260 1111955 83 11 60 12 195
CRW_00271 0.48 0.41 0.55 190 1122405 171 26 130 15 272
CRW_00273 0.51 0.43 0.60 194 1085280 142 14 113 15 252
CRW_00275 0.62 0.54 0.70 249 1114913 130 13 96 21 208
CRW_00277 0.48 0.36 0.64 165 1110536 105 15 79 11 288
CRW_00278 0.49 0.41 0.57 186 1129931 157 13 126 18 264
CRW_00279 0.54 0.45 0.64 209 1180088 132 19 100 13 255
CRW_00280 0.53 0.42 0.67 192 1117973 105 9 86 10 261
CRW_00281 0.62 0.57 0.68 265 1144950 146 18 108 20 199
CRW_00283 0.40 0.32 0.51 138 1015753 153 22 112 19 294
CRW_00284 0.48 0.36 0.65 162 1131511 101 11 76 14 294
CRW_00285 0.67 0.59 0.76 268 1117909 98 16 67 15 190
CRW_00289 0.61 0.55 0.68 260 1189270 143 18 105 20 216
CRW_00292 0.35 0.31 0.41 141 1123903 217 34 172 11 320
CRW_00306 0.29 0.26 0.32 120 1445480 309 50 200 59 342
CRW_00326 0.57 0.48 0.67 240 1627752 163 19 99 45 262
CRW_00358 0.42 0.39 0.45 200 1674917 285 39 209 37 307
CRW_00366 0.34 0.31 0.38 150 1579355 289 44 204 41 332
CRW_00371 0.47 0.39 0.56 194 1611562 196 29 125 42 302
CRW_00372 0.48 0.41 0.58 202 1625955 204 26 123 55 296
CRW_00386 0.32 0.30 0.34 156 1750800 337 47 253 37 359
CRW_00411 0.42 0.35 0.49 173 1615153 226 27 150 49 323
CRW_00414 0.42 0.36 0.48 180 1665851 239 34 160 45 315
CRW_00466 0.71 0.64 0.79 292 1116394 100 14 65 21 166
CRW_00589 0.34 0.28 0.42 125 1094162 188 16 157 15 320
CRW_00590 0.37 0.32 0.43 143 1119420 207 36 157 14 309
CRW_00591 0.65 0.59 0.72 261 1098541 124 19 82 23 185
CRW_00759 0.34 0.28 0.42 134 1636828 232 34 149 49 347
CRW_00763 0.39 0.29 0.53 130 1215775 153 18 97 38 316
CRW_00772 0.38 0.30 0.50 120 945758 137 16 106 15 284
CRW_00778 0.54 0.38 0.77 146 1201835 66 6 38 22 238
CRW_00789 0.51 0.40 0.65 179 1137510 120 5 92 23 268
CRW_00795 0.35 0.28 0.44 110 1152672 173 15 124 34 284
CRW_00800 0.58 0.49 0.69 230 1401641 149 10 94 45 240
CRW_00849 0.59 0.56 0.62 265 1117830 190 14 151 25 205
CRW_00997 0.63 0.55 0.72 256 1135921 119 15 86 18 208
CRW_01153 0.41 0.37 0.45 185 1606114 268 39 190 39 318
CRW_01171 0.46 0.41 0.52 206 1593608 228 40 151 37 300
CRW_01343 0.46 0.41 0.52 176 977564 173 23 138 12 258
PDB_00703 0.55 0.49 0.61 244 1073448 180 13 140 27 251
PDB_00854 0.53 0.49 0.57 264 1500316 234 15 183 36 271
PDB_01088 0.46 0.39 0.55 215 1471076 203 25 154 24 332
PDB_01103 0.57 0.53 0.61 297 1606045 214 20 166 28 265
PDB_01105 0.62 0.57 0.68 307 1433517 177 8 139 30 233
PDB_01120 0.49 0.42 0.59 220 1204752 177 19 137 21 307
PDB_01273 0.51 0.47 0.56 229 1117849 211 14 168 29 262

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.