CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & CMfinder(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold CMfinder(seed)
MCC 0.522 > 0.355
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.480 ± 0.104 > 0.384 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.512 > 0.182
Positive Predictive Value 0.533 < 0.696
Total TP 784 > 279
Total TN 945317 < 946386
Total FP 875 > 130
Total FP CONTRA 129 > 6
Total FP INCONS 557 > 116
Total FP COMP 189 > 8
Total FN 748 < 1253
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and CMfinder(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and CMfinder(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CMfinder(seed)).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 784
Total TN 945317
Total FP 875
Total FP CONTRA 129
Total FP INCONS 557
Total FP COMP 189
Total FN 748
Total Scores
MCC 0.522
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.480 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.533
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.22 0.22 0.22 25 103625 113 13 77 23 90
CRW_00016 0.65 0.62 0.69 74 77313 47 5 29 13 46
CRW_00610 0.42 0.42 0.43 34 36235 46 6 40 0 47
CRW_00613 0.46 0.42 0.51 33 34915 41 2 30 9 45
CRW_00614 0.07 0.09 0.06 5 121689 141 24 53 64 52
CRW_00633 0.45 0.44 0.47 47 63445 58 10 44 4 59
CRW_00670 0.77 0.74 0.81 89 70015 26 0 21 5 31
CRW_00671 0.66 0.64 0.68 75 62725 41 8 27 6 42
CRW_00672 0.74 0.73 0.74 81 72281 36 10 18 8 30
CRW_00674 0.55 0.55 0.55 68 83312 61 8 48 5 56
CRW_00676 0.54 0.56 0.52 64 93406 75 17 41 17 51
CRW_00692 0.57 0.57 0.57 51 68545 54 15 24 15 39
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2677 25 1 23 1 23
PDB_00827 0.67 0.59 0.76 48 26965 16 0 15 1 33
PDB_01092 0.69 0.60 0.79 31 10114 11 1 7 3 21
RFA_00632 0.40 0.39 0.41 11 4068 18 0 16 2 17
RFA_00636 0.42 0.43 0.43 12 3977 17 2 14 1 16
RFA_00769 0.55 0.56 0.56 10 1935 10 3 5 2 8
RFA_00770 0.68 0.56 0.83 10 2004 6 0 2 4 8
RFA_00773 0.71 0.56 0.91 10 1942 5 1 0 4 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2001 16 2 13 1 16
RFA_00809 0.36 0.38 0.35 6 2128 12 1 10 1 10

^top



Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 279
Total TN 946386
Total FP 130
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 116
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 1253
Total Scores
MCC 0.355
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.384 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.182
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00013 0.37 0.14 1.00 16 103724 0 0 0 0 99
CRW_00016 0.36 0.14 0.89 17 77402 2 0 2 0 103
CRW_00610 0.49 0.31 0.78 25 36283 7 1 6 0 56
CRW_00613 0.54 0.33 0.87 26 34950 4 0 4 0 52
CRW_00614 0.46 0.25 0.88 14 121755 9 0 2 7 43
CRW_00633 0.32 0.12 0.81 13 63530 3 1 2 0 93
CRW_00670 0.32 0.18 0.55 22 70085 18 0 18 0 98
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
CRW_00692 0.41 0.17 1.00 15 68620 0 0 0 0 75
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2688 13 0 13 0 23
PDB_00827 0.25 0.10 0.62 8 27015 5 0 5 0 73
PDB_01092 0.38 0.21 0.69 11 10137 6 0 5 1 41
RFA_00632 0.27 0.25 0.29 7 4071 17 0 17 0 21
RFA_00636 0.71 0.64 0.78 18 3982 5 2 3 0 10
RFA_00769 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 1944 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7
RFA_00809 0.41 0.38 0.46 6 2132 7 1 6 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.