CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna NanoFolder
MCC 0.435 > 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.450 ± 0.312 > 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.404 > 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.479 > 0.281
Total TP 67 > 57
Total TN 18889 > 18826
Total FP 84 < 159
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 22
Total FP INCONS 67 < 124
Total FP COMP 11 < 13
Total FN 99 < 109
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 67
Total TN 18889
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 99
Total Scores
MCC 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.450 ± 0.312
Sensitivity 0.404
Positive Predictive Value 0.479
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 0.41 0.40 0.43 10 3298 13 3 10 0 15
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00851 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 4 4721 28 0 28 0 37
PDB_01009 0.86 0.86 0.86 18 2464 6 0 3 3 3
RFA_00770 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 2003 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00773 0.45 0.39 0.54 7 1940 9 0 6 3 11
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1999 19 3 14 2 16

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 18826
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 124
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.304
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.351
Sensitivity 0.343
Positive Predictive Value 0.281
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3286 36 6 29 1 25
PDB_00828 0.30 0.33 0.28 9 2453 23 0 23 0 18
PDB_00851 - 0.16 0.17 0.17 7 4711 35 3 32 0 34
PDB_01009 0.27 0.33 0.23 7 2455 25 3 20 2 14
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.