CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CMfinder(seed) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CMfinder(seed) NanoFolder
MCC 0.307 > 0.236
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.250 < 0.366 ± 0.341
Sensitivity 0.139 < 0.279
Positive Predictive Value 0.679 > 0.202
Total TP 72 < 145
Total TN 318068 > 317457
Total FP 34 < 595
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 116
Total FP INCONS 33 < 456
Total FP COMP 0 < 23
Total FN 447 > 374
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CMfinder(seed) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and NanoFolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and NanoFolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CMfinder(seed) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CMfinder(seed) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of CMfinder(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CMfinder(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 72
Total TN 318068
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 447
Total Scores
MCC 0.307
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.353 ± 0.250
Sensitivity 0.139
Positive Predictive Value 0.679
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CMfinder(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00671 0.20 0.09 0.41 11 62808 16 0 16 0 106
CRW_00672 0.38 0.15 0.94 17 72372 1 0 1 0 94
CRW_00674 0.40 0.17 0.95 21 83414 1 0 1 0 103
CRW_00676 0.12 0.04 0.33 5 93513 10 1 9 0 110
RFA_00770 0.71 0.50 1.00 9 2007 0 0 0 0 9
RFA_00773 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1949 4 0 4 0 18
RFA_00808 0.68 0.56 0.82 9 2005 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 145
Total TN 317457
Total FP 595
Total FP CONTRA 116
Total FP INCONS 456
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 374
Total Scores
MCC 0.236
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.366 ± 0.341
Sensitivity 0.279
Positive Predictive Value 0.202
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
CRW_00671 0.18 0.21 0.16 24 62682 130 23 106 1 93
CRW_00672 0.36 0.43 0.31 48 72233 114 35 74 5 63
CRW_00674 0.16 0.19 0.14 23 83274 142 19 120 3 101
CRW_00676 0.11 0.14 0.09 16 93347 169 29 136 4 99
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1996 24 0 20 4 18
RFA_00773 0.93 1.00 0.86 18 1932 9 3 0 6 0
RFA_00808 0.83 1.00 0.70 16 1993 7 7 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.