CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold MCFold
MCC 0.411 > 0.290
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.093 > 0.295 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.380 > 0.320
Positive Predictive Value 0.456 > 0.276
Total TP 372 > 313
Total TN 106677 > 106359
Total FP 455 < 871
Total FP CONTRA 51 < 116
Total FP INCONS 393 < 705
Total FP COMP 11 < 50
Total FN 607 < 666
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 372
Total TN 106677
Total FP 455
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 393
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 607
Total Scores
MCC 0.411
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.380
Positive Predictive Value 0.456
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.88 0.79 1.00 11 935 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00018 - 0.21 0.20 0.25 4 1019 12 2 10 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.42 0.35 0.54 7 767 6 0 6 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 6 624 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00053 - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 429 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4155 31 0 31 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 488 8 2 6 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.80 0.71 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.66 0.63 0.71 5 371 2 0 2 0 3
PDB_00138 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00209 - 0.68 0.55 0.86 6 554 1 1 0 0 5
PDB_00243 - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 623 0 0 0 0 5
PDB_00352 - 0.39 0.37 0.44 7 1209 9 0 9 0 12
PDB_00571 0.85 0.76 0.95 19 3301 1 1 0 0 6
PDB_00713 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1998 19 1 17 1 21
PDB_00716 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2680 22 0 21 1 23
PDB_00828 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00829 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 2260 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00842 - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 373 0 0 0 0 3
PDB_00851 - 0.42 0.39 0.47 16 4719 18 4 14 0 25
PDB_00857 - 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 1072 0 0 0 0 6
PDB_00874 - 0.10 0.10 0.13 2 931 13 2 11 0 18
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4152 34 0 34 0 40
PDB_00918 - 0.56 0.43 0.75 3 321 1 1 0 0 4
PDB_01009 0.90 0.90 0.90 19 2464 4 0 2 2 2
PDB_01020 0.86 0.74 1.00 17 2261 1 0 0 1 6
PDB_01040 - 0.31 0.30 0.35 6 1111 11 0 11 0 14
PDB_01059 - 0.56 0.43 0.75 3 227 1 1 0 0 4
PDB_01070 - 0.27 0.26 0.29 14 12672 34 0 34 0 40
PDB_01073 0.52 0.47 0.59 16 4344 12 1 10 1 18
PDB_01194 - 0.44 0.33 0.63 5 488 3 1 2 0 10
PDB_01201 - 0.82 0.68 1.00 15 1113 0 0 0 0 7
PDB_01203 - 0.74 0.68 0.81 13 1160 3 2 1 0 6
PDB_01250 - 0.15 0.15 0.16 6 12053 31 4 27 0 35
PDB_01260 - 0.44 0.36 0.56 9 1814 7 0 7 0 16
PDB_01281 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 366 12 0 12 0 14
PDB_01299 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 894 9 2 7 0 15
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9122 58 7 51 0 39
RFA_00636 0.51 0.50 0.52 14 3978 13 3 10 0 14
RFA_00767 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1875 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00768 0.47 0.44 0.50 8 1875 8 1 7 0 10
RFA_00769 0.54 0.56 0.53 10 1934 9 4 5 0 8
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2002 17 1 13 3 18
RFA_00773 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 1 5 0 8
RFA_00779 0.59 0.56 0.63 10 1937 6 3 3 0 8
RFA_00808 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2000 18 2 14 2 16
RFA_00809 0.40 0.38 0.43 6 2131 8 1 7 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 313
Total TN 106359
Total FP 871
Total FP CONTRA 116
Total FP INCONS 705
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 666
Total Scores
MCC 0.290
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.295 ± 0.081
Sensitivity 0.320
Positive Predictive Value 0.276
Nr of predictions 48

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
PDB_00005 0.76 0.79 0.73 11 931 6 2 2 2 3
PDB_00018 - 0.18 0.20 0.19 4 1014 17 2 15 0 16
PDB_00020 - 0.35 0.35 0.39 7 762 11 0 11 0 13
PDB_00041 - 0.23 0.25 0.23 3 617 12 0 10 2 9
PDB_00053 - 0.56 0.55 0.60 6 425 4 0 4 0 5
PDB_00056 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 616 0 0 0 0 2
PDB_00123 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4143 43 4 39 0 36
PDB_00124 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 484 12 2 10 0 10
PDB_00128 - 0.77 0.71 0.83 10 484 2 0 2 0 4
PDB_00134 - 0.58 0.63 0.56 5 369 5 1 3 1 3
PDB_00138 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 369 11 0 9 2 8
PDB_00209 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 550 11 2 9 0 11
PDB_00243 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 1 14 0 12
PDB_00352 - 0.18 0.21 0.18 4 1203 18 1 17 0 15
PDB_00571 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 3287 34 3 31 0 25
PDB_00713 - 0.21 0.24 0.21 5 1992 20 1 18 1 16
PDB_00716 0.22 0.26 0.19 6 2670 25 5 20 0 17
PDB_00828 0.34 0.37 0.33 10 2455 22 1 19 2 17
PDB_00829 0.25 0.29 0.23 7 2248 23 6 17 0 17
PDB_00842 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 369 10 0 9 1 8
PDB_00851 - 0.23 0.24 0.24 10 4711 32 0 32 0 31
PDB_00857 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1062 19 6 13 0 15
PDB_00874 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 926 20 0 20 0 20
PDB_00886 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4143 43 4 39 0 40
PDB_00918 - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 317 10 0 8 2 7
PDB_01009 0.43 0.52 0.35 11 2454 21 5 15 1 10
PDB_01020 0.29 0.30 0.29 7 2254 20 2 15 3 16
PDB_01040 - 0.28 0.30 0.29 6 1107 15 2 13 0 14
PDB_01059 - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 223 8 2 6 0 7
PDB_01070 - 0.68 0.70 0.66 38 12662 22 2 18 2 16
PDB_01073 0.52 0.56 0.49 19 4332 22 1 19 2 15
PDB_01194 - 0.66 0.60 0.75 9 484 3 0 3 0 6
PDB_01201 - 0.75 0.68 0.83 15 1110 3 0 3 0 7
PDB_01203 - 0.73 0.74 0.74 14 1157 5 4 1 0 5
PDB_01250 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12036 54 18 36 0 41
PDB_01260 - 0.55 0.56 0.56 14 1805 11 1 10 0 11
PDB_01281 - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 365 13 0 13 0 14
PDB_01299 - 0.66 0.67 0.67 10 888 7 1 4 2 5
PDB_01309 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 9122 58 9 49 0 39
RFA_00636 0.36 0.39 0.34 11 3973 29 0 21 8 17
RFA_00767 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00768 0.36 0.44 0.31 8 1865 19 3 15 1 10
RFA_00769 0.45 0.50 0.41 9 1931 18 2 11 5 9
RFA_00770 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1992 29 2 22 5 18
RFA_00773 0.43 0.50 0.38 9 1929 16 4 11 1 9
RFA_00779 0.45 0.56 0.37 10 1926 17 7 10 0 8
RFA_00808 0.39 0.44 0.35 7 1996 19 1 12 6 9
RFA_00809 0.30 0.38 0.25 6 2121 18 6 12 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.